"trademark law is important to enable the trademark proprietor to develop goodwill for the product or service and prevent other parties from exploiting the brand." - I know when it comes to selling "fake" gucci etc you can get in trouble and i thought when you sell certain brands they can also sue you, idk. Not my problem.trashtalk_77 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 9:03 amWould it be though? I don't think she needs permission to resell clothing, that's what Poshmark is all about. I could be wrong though/not getting the question lolHoney06 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 7:04 amAnd I thought that will be trademark issues? She is using manufacturer to reselling? She needs their permissionsparklesandsequins wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 1:20 amit kills me that people are buying FOREVER 21 from her for $30 when you know she bought it for $10. It seems like she's just making up random numbers for half the original prices to scam people into thinking they're actually getting a deal.
Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
(English is my second language)
-
- Learner
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2017 7:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
Yeah, but I don’t think something like that applies to poshmark or it wouldn’t exist. BUT I do think there should be a system to prevent people from selling shit they got for FREE. That’s just sleezy.Honey06 wrote:"trademark law is important to enable the trademark proprietor to develop goodwill for the product or service and prevent other parties from exploiting the brand." - I know when it comes to selling "fake" gucci etc you can get in trouble and i thought when you sell certain brands they can also sue you, idk. Not my problem.trashtalk_77 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 9:03 amWould it be though? I don't think she needs permission to resell clothing, that's what Poshmark is all about. I could be wrong though/not getting the question lolHoney06 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 7:04 amAnd I thought that will be trademark issues? She is using manufacturer to reselling? She needs their permissionsparklesandsequins wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 1:20 amit kills me that people are buying FOREVER 21 from her for $30 when you know she bought it for $10. It seems like she's just making up random numbers for half the original prices to scam people into thinking they're actually getting a deal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- whyareyoulikethis
- Learner
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 8:06 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
ooh the one time my job working in intellectual property law will come in handy on this forum! her reselling those clothes doesn't pose any issues as far as trademark infringement is concerned she is disgustingly greedy tho when it comes to her reselling products she was GIFTED (i'd argue it's a little less than ethical by many standards but she's a lost cause) and selling decently worn clothing at a negligible discount.
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:52 am
- Has thanked: 38 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- Contact:
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
She does that closet clean out but then on Insta posts that huge box of new clothes..lord
ALSO, am I crazy or are those man shoes @12:23 of that video? I'm just searching for those clues now lmao
ALSO, am I crazy or are those man shoes @12:23 of that video? I'm just searching for those clues now lmao
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
I think in some countries in Europe its different (?), and thats why I was confused, idk!whyareyoulikethis wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 6:21 pmooh the one time my job working in intellectual property law will come in handy on this forum! her reselling those clothes doesn't pose any issues as far as trademark infringement is concerned she is disgustingly greedy tho when it comes to her reselling products she was GIFTED (i'd argue it's a little less than ethical by many standards but she's a lost cause) and selling decently worn clothing at a negligible discount.
But thanks for educating me!
(English is my second language)
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
And btw, can someone tell me which account is Tara? I don't really want to answer a rude person.
(English is my second language)
-
- Talker
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:47 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
yes!!! good eye, those are totally basketball shoes. does that mean he's living there part time again?trashtalk_77 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 7:10 pmShe does that closet clean out but then on Insta posts that huge box of new clothes..lord
ALSO, am I crazy or are those man shoes @12:23 of that video? I'm just searching for those clues now lmao
-
- Talker
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:47 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
trashthem and trasheveryone_ are the accounts in question lmao
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
Someone commented on her newest video something like “we all know you are back with Taylor and that’s why you can’t vlog it yet” but I don’t see it anymore so she must have deleted. I like how she made the title and thumbnail to look like she was doing that drive thru challenge but really it was just a couple minutes at the end of the Vlog with Brian while he filmed it for his channel
Also, how many times is she going to talk about how her Disney Vlogs got no views?
Also, how many times is she going to talk about how her Disney Vlogs got no views?
- LivingInElysium
- NAUGHTY
- Posts: 2733
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:21 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
And trashynatalie from before. She doesn't seem to use it anymore.dancingabby wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 12:10 pmtrashthem and trasheveryone_ are the accounts in question lmao
Should've. Would've. Could've. Should of. Would of. Could of. Should have. Would have. Could have.
- LivingInElysium
- NAUGHTY
- Posts: 2733
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:21 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Tara "Fake Lips" Michelle | Part 2
PLEASE CONTINUE HERE: viewtopic.php?f=155&t=36137
Should've. Would've. Could've. Should of. Would of. Could of. Should have. Would have. Could have.