John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5

[tatortot20093]

Sorry for double post, won't let me edit.

I deciphered the word oxfoliate some pages back and it means to remove leaves/flakes with oxygen.... not with an emollient. The journal that was mentioned in the previous page looks like it's the 'legit' definition : removes a chemical with oxygen particles (??) ...it's definitely not scrubbing lips with vaseline and a towel lol xxx

Sorry not believing you. All of the time I saw it in journals it was talking of removing some sort of flesh or organic matter. How did you decipher it? By saying ox means oxygen?

Here are examples of modern day useage in cosmetic. You can't convince me it three coincidences. It's a word ffs!

https://www.coconail-spa.com/price-list ... e-galleria
Description of two pedicures
https://www.advancedskincarevt.com/microdermabrasion
Under precision peel
https://www.transdesign.com/compare/8634/7385/8643/7388
In the description under the light blueish product on the left


Okay. Done now

Were you that person on twitter? Just wondering why you'd repost these since 2 are typos and 1 is in reference to an actual procedure that isn't simply exfoliating (though this could also be a mistake considering it's just some random cosmetologists site).

The salon one is clearly by one of those salons where even the manager doesn't speak English. Its riddled with typos.

The other is a product description that contains a typo. Search "EzFlow - 2 In 1 Balance" on Google images. You'll see an image of the actual product which says "exfoliate with..." On it rather than "oxfoliate with". The description is also modified for reputable sites selling the product. It doesn't say that on the listing for it on Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/Flow-Balance-Dis ... B004NMYJGW

As we've learned thanks to bitchboy it's a word. But it isn't used in cosmetics. 2-3 typos on the internet isn't unbelievable considering how much pages there are on it. YES this whole argument is splitting hairs. But it's justified considering he loves latching on to people for stuff like this.

Per the Twitter poster, allegedly, it is a bougie word used in British spas

Not trying to perpetuate, but I think a key piece of evidence regarding the word’s legitimacy in John’s case is that...we’re all in debate about it! If it were a common COSMETIC word, I doubt there’d be so many of us going on about it.

So, is it a word: I’m sure it is, like Rachael, I don’t know all the words.
Is John using it correctly: probably not.

[Banannie]

All the "oxfoliate" discussion is valid, but can we sit for a minute and talk about toxic ingredients. I don't know if that was discussed before but it's concerning as fuck.

Lethalcosmetics analyzed his ingredients on this page: http://gurugossiper.com/viewtopic.php?f ... &start=250

Idk what is allegedly toxic in there. I would think lethalcosmetics would say if anything in there was of concern.

fair enough. but isn't concerning how difficult is to FIND the ingredients? do you remember how some brands were caught omitting toxic ingredients?

anyways... on the topic a person said listed these ingredients:

LIPSTICK / 6 ml / 0.2 fl.oz. / INGREDIENTS: ISODODECANE, DIMETHICONE, MICROCRYSTALLINE, DIISOSTERARYL MALATE, TRIMETHYSILOXYSILICATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED EXTRACT, METHYLMETHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER, PHENOXYETHANOL/ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, VITAMIN E, PROPYLENE CARBONATE

I heard a youtuber talk about METHYLMETHACRYLATE and how controversial it is. i didn't find anything substantially related to cosmetics but i ain't buying this sketchy ass makeup until some organization gives it a pass. i saw an article but it was related to dentistry.

[yadayadayeah]

All the "oxfoliate" discussion is valid, but can we sit for a minute and talk about toxic ingredients. I don't know if that was discussed before but it's concerning as fuck.

Lethalcosmetics analyzed his ingredients on this page: http://gurugossiper.com/viewtopic.php?f ... &start=250

Idk what is allegedly toxic in there. I would think lethalcosmetics would say if anything in there was of concern.

fair enough. but isn't concerning how difficult is to FIND the ingredients? do you remember how some brands were caught omitting toxic ingredients?

anyways... on the topic a person said listed these ingredients:

LIPSTICK / 6 ml / 0.2 fl.oz. / INGREDIENTS: ISODODECANE, DIMETHICONE, MICROCRYSTALLINE, DIISOSTERARYL MALATE, TRIMETHYSILOXYSILICATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED EXTRACT, METHYLMETHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER, PHENOXYETHANOL/ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, VITAMIN E, PROPYLENE CARBONATE

I heard a youtuber talk about METHYLMETHACRYLATE and how controversial it is. i didn't find anything substantially related to cosmetics but i ain't buying this sketchy ass makeup until some organization gives it a pass. i saw an article but it was related to dentistry.

He used Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer as a texturing agent. It has been ruled safe. Youtubers are morons.

I don't think L'Oreal would use it if it is dangerous.

For the scientifically oriented:

[Banannie]

All the "oxfoliate" discussion is valid, but can we sit for a minute and talk about toxic ingredients. I don't know if that was discussed before but it's concerning as fuck.

Lethalcosmetics analyzed his ingredients on this page: http://gurugossiper.com/viewtopic.php?f ... &start=250

Idk what is allegedly toxic in there. I would think lethalcosmetics would say if anything in there was of concern.

fair enough. but isn't concerning how difficult is to FIND the ingredients? do you remember how some brands were caught omitting toxic ingredients?

anyways... on the topic a person said listed these ingredients:

LIPSTICK / 6 ml / 0.2 fl.oz. / INGREDIENTS: ISODODECANE, DIMETHICONE, MICROCRYSTALLINE, DIISOSTERARYL MALATE, TRIMETHYSILOXYSILICATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED EXTRACT, METHYLMETHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER, PHENOXYETHANOL/ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, VITAMIN E, PROPYLENE CARBONATE

I heard a youtuber talk about METHYLMETHACRYLATE and how controversial it is. i didn't find anything substantially related to cosmetics but i ain't buying this sketchy ass makeup until some organization gives it a pass. i saw an article but it was related to dentistry.

He used Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer as a texturing agent. It has been ruled safe. Youtubers are morons.

I don't think L'Oreal would use it if it is dangerous.

For the scientifically oriented:

I saw the same website. It's like the first. That's why I said I didn't find anything substantial. i think loreal is concerned about selling. they buy every company and they create an empire. look at deodorants that still use aluminum.

[LifesaBeach]

Yessss so happy there’s a thread for him! Sick and tired of his lies


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Banannie]

Yessss so happy there’s a thread for him! Sick and tired of his lies


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lies, defamation, manipulation, victim, his tone. Heck yeah he deserves a thread.

[yadayadayeah]

All the "oxfoliate" discussion is valid, but can we sit for a minute and talk about toxic ingredients. I don't know if that was discussed before but it's concerning as fuck.

Lethalcosmetics analyzed his ingredients on this page: http://gurugossiper.com/viewtopic.php?f ... &start=250

Idk what is allegedly toxic in there. I would think lethalcosmetics would say if anything in there was of concern.

fair enough. but isn't concerning how difficult is to FIND the ingredients? do you remember how some brands were caught omitting toxic ingredients?

anyways... on the topic a person said listed these ingredients:

LIPSTICK / 6 ml / 0.2 fl.oz. / INGREDIENTS: ISODODECANE, DIMETHICONE, MICROCRYSTALLINE, DIISOSTERARYL MALATE, TRIMETHYSILOXYSILICATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED EXTRACT, METHYLMETHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER, PHENOXYETHANOL/ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, VITAMIN E, PROPYLENE CARBONATE

I heard a youtuber talk about METHYLMETHACRYLATE and how controversial it is. i didn't find anything substantially related to cosmetics but i ain't buying this sketchy ass makeup until some organization gives it a pass. i saw an article but it was related to dentistry.

He used Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer as a texturing agent. It has been ruled safe. Youtubers are morons.

I don't think L'Oreal would use it if it is dangerous.

For the scientifically oriented:

I saw the same website. It's like the first. That's why I said I didn't find anything substantial. i think loreal is concerned about selling. they buy every company and they create an empire. look at deodorants that still use aluminum.

From the second site, there are 187 beauty products listed that have this crosspolymer. Some of the brands include Physicians Formula, Rimmel, CoverGirl, L'Oreal, KKW, Maybelline, Philosophy, Revlon, Wet n Wild, Almay, Aveeno, Benefit, etc. Leathalcosmetics seemed fairly comfortable identifying it as a texturing agent. I personally don't know anything about cosmetic formulation but it seems to be an industry standard if that many companies used it.

https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/browse.php ... iXywEqnFPY

[Guest]

Really hoping I didn’t double post and apologies if I did.

This is going to sound like a Peter Monn post but I swear it’s kuckian related. I have not been on GG in a while but just came flying back in over something I caught to see if anyone else did. I was scrolling my twitter feed, minding my own business when an Auto tweet pops up from Peter Monn “ I liked a video on YouTube” when I saw what it was, I immediately replied but he has already deleted the tweet.

Is this drama all bull crap? If some little loser threatened legal action against me, slandered my name, etc. I’d not be liking his videos. Something shady is going on. Is this all for views?

<a href="http://tinypic.com?ref=d72hj" target="_blank"><img src="http://i68.tinypic.com/d72hj.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

[yadayadayeah]

Really hoping I didn’t double post and apologies if I did.

This is going to sound like a Peter Monn post but I swear it’s kuckian related. I have not been on GG in a while but just came flying back in over something I caught to see if anyone else did. I was scrolling my twitter feed, minding my own business when an Auto tweet pops up from Peter Monn “ I liked a video on YouTube” when I saw what it was, I immediately replied but he has already deleted the tweet.

Is this drama all bull crap? If some little loser threatened legal action against me, slandered my name, etc. I’d not be liking his videos. Something shady is going on. Is this all for views?

<a href="http://tinypic.com?ref=d72hj" target="_blank"><img src="http://i68.tinypic.com/d72hj.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

I noticed that too. He had something else but deleted it before I saw what it was. Maybe fat fingers? I know he is probably stalking Kuckian atm to see if he is mentioned. IMO, he seems genuinely heated in his Kuckian videos

[gg518]

All the "oxfoliate" discussion is valid, but can we sit for a minute and talk about toxic ingredients. I don't know if that was discussed before but it's concerning as fuck.

Lethalcosmetics analyzed his ingredients on this page: http://gurugossiper.com/viewtopic.php?f ... &start=250

Idk what is allegedly toxic in there. I would think lethalcosmetics would say if anything in there was of concern.

fair enough. but isn't concerning how difficult is to FIND the ingredients? do you remember how some brands were caught omitting toxic ingredients?

anyways... on the topic a person said listed these ingredients:

LIPSTICK / 6 ml / 0.2 fl.oz. / INGREDIENTS: ISODODECANE, DIMETHICONE, MICROCRYSTALLINE, DIISOSTERARYL MALATE, TRIMETHYSILOXYSILICATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED EXTRACT, METHYLMETHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER, PHENOXYETHANOL/ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, VITAMIN E, PROPYLENE CARBONATE

I heard a youtuber talk about METHYLMETHACRYLATE and how controversial it is. i didn't find anything substantially related to cosmetics but i ain't buying this sketchy ass makeup until some organization gives it a pass. i saw an article but it was related to dentistry.

He used Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer as a texturing agent. It has been ruled safe. Youtubers are morons.

I don't think L'Oreal would use it if it is dangerous.

For the scientifically oriented:

I saw the same website. It's like the first. That's why I said I didn't find anything substantial. i think loreal is concerned about selling. they buy every company and they create an empire. look at deodorants that still use aluminum.

Because there isn't clear scientific evidence to link it to breast cancer.

All the "oxfoliate" discussion is valid, but can we sit for a minute and talk about toxic ingredients. I don't know if that was discussed before but it's concerning as fuck.

Lethalcosmetics analyzed his ingredients on this page: http://gurugossiper.com/viewtopic.php?f ... &start=250

Idk what is allegedly toxic in there. I would think lethalcosmetics would say if anything in there was of concern.

fair enough. but isn't concerning how difficult is to FIND the ingredients? do you remember how some brands were caught omitting toxic ingredients?

anyways... on the topic a person said listed these ingredients:

LIPSTICK / 6 ml / 0.2 fl.oz. / INGREDIENTS: ISODODECANE, DIMETHICONE, MICROCRYSTALLINE, DIISOSTERARYL MALATE, TRIMETHYSILOXYSILICATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED EXTRACT, METHYLMETHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER, PHENOXYETHANOL/ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, VITAMIN E, PROPYLENE CARBONATE

I heard a youtuber talk about METHYLMETHACRYLATE and how controversial it is. i didn't find anything substantially related to cosmetics but i ain't buying this sketchy ass makeup until some organization gives it a pass. i saw an article but it was related to dentistry.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10. ... %3Dpubmed&
It's fine from the FDAs point of view. It was weird that he took so long to post the ingredients, but I can't find anything to fault them by.

[dailysunshine]

Brings up interesting points about Kuckian’s supposed art career.

The Josh Show is investigating him!!!! He will go extra miles to verify everything John Kuckian said/claimed then debunk all the lies.
Can't wait for more videos!!

Btw, John, don't bother to threaten Josh with law suit, he has his legal team looks at the materials and scripts before filming and he's in Japan.

[Guest]

Really hoping I didn’t double post and apologies if I did.

This is going to sound like a Peter Monn post but I swear it’s kuckian related. I have not been on GG in a while but just came flying back in over something I caught to see if anyone else did. I was scrolling my twitter feed, minding my own business when an Auto tweet pops up from Peter Monn “ I liked a video on YouTube” when I saw what it was, I immediately replied but he has already deleted the tweet.

Is this drama all bull crap? If some little loser threatened legal action against me, slandered my name, etc. I’d not be liking his videos. Something shady is going on. Is this all for views?

<a href="http://tinypic.com?ref=d72hj" target="_blank"><img src="http://i68.tinypic.com/d72hj.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

I noticed that too. He had something else but deleted it before I saw what it was. Maybe fat fingers? I know he is probably stalking Kuckian atm to see if he is mentioned. IMO, he seems genuinely heated in his Kuckian videos

You’re right. I was letting myself get worked up thinking they were conning is for views but I’m sure it was like when your deep, deep in someone’s Insta and like a photo from July 17, 2015 lol

[yadayadayeah]

Brings up interesting points about Kuckian’s supposed art career.

The Josh Show is investigating him!!!! He will go extra miles to verify everything John Kuckian said/claimed then debunk all the lies.
Can't wait for more videos!!

Btw, John, don't bother to threaten Josh with law suit, he has his legal team looks at the materials and scripts before filming and he's in Japan.

I watched his video. At least he did something fresh, unlike the other drama channels. Have you spoken to the guy before? Someone should have him call Chantel Rahme and Gi Picco's and see if they have any affiliation with Kuckian. I am sure that would be interesting to watch.

[LiddlePallid]

I'm getting so sick of his snapchat. WHy is he just NOW swatching everything? lmao is this the first time he's gotten his hands on his entire collection so he can actually play with it?

[yadayadayeah]

Really hoping I didn’t double post and apologies if I did.

This is going to sound like a Peter Monn post but I swear it’s kuckian related. I have not been on GG in a while but just came flying back in over something I caught to see if anyone else did. I was scrolling my twitter feed, minding my own business when an Auto tweet pops up from Peter Monn “ I liked a video on YouTube” when I saw what it was, I immediately replied but he has already deleted the tweet.

Is this drama all bull crap? If some little loser threatened legal action against me, slandered my name, etc. I’d not be liking his videos. Something shady is going on. Is this all for views?

<a href="http://tinypic.com?ref=d72hj" target="_blank"><img src="http://i68.tinypic.com/d72hj.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

I noticed that too. He had something else but deleted it before I saw what it was. Maybe fat fingers? I know he is probably stalking Kuckian atm to see if he is mentioned. IMO, he seems genuinely heated in his Kuckian videos

You’re right. I was letting myself get worked up thinking they were conning is for views but I’m sure it was like when your deep, deep in someone’s Insta and like a photo from July 17, 2015 lol

Allegedly John threatened to sue Peter so I am sure Peter is watching John's social media like a hound. Moaning peter monn also mentioned doing a video (7th one thus far? lol) about the whole lawsuit thing soon, so who knows.

[LeGarconBleu]

I honestly think the delay in posting, which btw it's still not on his website, is that there isn't anything special in his ingredients like he was saying he had. Just more scamming.

I saw The Josh Show video, yea the art career stunt was a good thing to cover. Just goes to show how much Krookian can lie. It'd be great if he would do an interview with Krookian.

[yadayadayeah]

Last time I checked he was at 194 on the pigments. Look what it is now.



Did he get a bunch of cancellations?

Finally fix his inventory numbers?

[marni]

Last time I checked he was at 194 on the pigments. Look what it is now.



Did he get a bunch of cancellations?

Finally fix his inventory numbers?

Is that meant to be SALvage or SAVage?

[Helenanders]

Last time I checked he was at 194 on the pigments. Look what it is now.



Did he get a bunch of cancellations?

Finally fix his inventory numbers?

I've seen a few posts about the numbers of his orders, can I ask how on earth are people figuring this out? Is it based on actual numbers or just guess work? x

[Jesters Trix]

so I found his dad's twitter account I believe (or someone related to him... they all live at the same address or did), his bother's middle name is also crookian (odd), and his mom is also listed at the same address. I wonder if these people really don't see (or don't care?) what this lunatic is up to. I know he said he left at 17, but surely at least his brother has informed them of his apparent issues. Sad really.