Fleur De Smug and Her "Little Bug" | Part 21

[grimaldispepperoni]

I am actually shocked, I only just looked at Lady Fleurs IG account and can't believe she has all those pics of 'Bugsy' wearing outfits of the day and she has cut her face off in every single pic, always no higher than her nose. It's so odd, she must be hiding something that she believes is not cute. It doesn't make sense to post pics with 1/3 of her face showing. It's like she doesn't want people to comment on her appearance for some reason? She even blocked one pic out and put an emoji covering her face in a cafe/restaurant. I have never ever seen a Mum hide her child's face like this. Why bother putting the outfits on there, she's obviously trying to get sponsored. Alternatively, she might be delusional and think that she's a celeb and the whole world wants to make money out of pics of 'Bugsy's' face so she's hiding it. It reminds me of how Michael Jackson and how he covered his kid's faces. She definitely seems a bit wacko like him! He wanted to be Peter Pan, whereas Lady Fleur looks more like the stepmother in Snow White when she gives the poison apple to Snow White with bulging eyes, hooked nose and pointy chin.

I completely respect her choice to not show her kid's face. In the age of parents, including "celebrities" and pseudo celebs like Fleur, making public instagram accounts for their small kids, it's refreshing imo. She said while she was pregnant that she would not be showing the baby on camera.

Yeah absolutely... But in that case why is she using the baby in ads for clothes etc? If you're not going to show the baby imo that means strictly no baby pics, not using her to rake in sponsorships but cropping off her head... I think that's so much worse than the odd photo of her, head included!

Yeah you are right that is odd. I don't even follow her anymore because she is so freaking boring so I guess I haven't seen the cropped head pics. She's never had interesting content; her taste is so bland and boring. I guess the baby clothes are the only new content she can generate. I wish she would show herself renovating that insane mansion... the architecture from the snippets she has shown is lovely. That would actually be interesting and unique content especially given her seemingly limitless budget, but her taste in home decor, like fashion, is so bland that she could make that a snooze too.

[LaurieLaurie]

I wonder if you’re allowed to be Fleur’s friend if you don’t have an elaborate, over-the-top, or destination wedding.

Money socialises with money.

This is probably why she hasn’t made any mummy friends.

[lalalambd]

She just posted on her insta stories "unpack & repack" - is she off on another trip AGAIN????

I have no problems with her working and Mike looking after "little one" but "Bugsy" is going to start talking, walking, doing all sorts of firsts soon - can she honestly live with herself missing such an important first because of a trip???? It's crazy, she is so emotionally removed from that headless kid.

[LaurieLaurie]

She’s flying today. Has she not taken River?

[Pleiadian Starseed]

I believe she has gone away again without 'Bugsy' as one of her IG pics is a message to Mike and from what it says it doesn't appear he's' with her so I am pretty sure Bugsy has been left behind again! I expect we will know for sure in the next couple of days.

[lalalambd]

Granny but I have a 9 month old male pup and I daren't miss any of his walks RN because i'm afraid to miss him cocking him leg for the first time - how on earth could she be OK with missing her child's first ANYTHING?!

[Pleiadian Starseed]

Just attempted to watched Lady Fleurs latest video where she has done an ASOS haul for Mike, I got 4 mins in and had to stop. The second thing she pulled out of the bag was a pair of Ralph Lauren sunglasses and Mike's face looked confused and his first response was in a very high pitched annoyed voice and he said "What's wrong with my sunglasses's already! " he seemed totally baffled as to why he would need a new pair. In contrast to Lady Fleur and her multiple designer sunglasses that she 'needs' a year he seemed much more normal and happy with what he already. This just shows how Fleur just 'needs' to buy things all the time. It shows just how unhappy she is and wants to fill this void with 'things'

[drasticactions]

I agree^ but I also think Mike was pretty insufferable the whole video, he didn't like the pastel yellow shirt eventhough he was wearing pink, she picked other things that to me looked like Mike's style and he was pretty annoying about how "horrible" it all was. Fleur even called him a snob!

[Photosynthesis]

I agree^ but I also think Mike was pretty insufferable the whole video, he didn't like the pastel yellow shirt eventhough he was wearing pink, she picked other things that to me looked like Mike's style and he was pretty annoying about how "horrible" it all was. Fleur even called him a snob!

They’re both quite snobby if you ask me

[LaurieLaurie]

If she has left her for another holiday then it’s only a sign of how she will spend her whole summer. Poor excuse of a mother.

[litnerd]

I agree^ but I also think Mike was pretty insufferable the whole video, he didn't like the pastel yellow shirt eventhough he was wearing pink, she picked other things that to me looked like Mike's style and he was pretty annoying about how "horrible" it all was. Fleur even called him a snob!

Maybe he was trying to get her back for being such a bitch when he did her ASOS haul.

[Clover la BonBon]

I agree^ but I also think Mike was pretty insufferable the whole video, he didn't like the pastel yellow shirt eventhough he was wearing pink, she picked other things that to me looked like Mike's style and he was pretty annoying about how "horrible" it all was. Fleur even called him a snob!

Maybe he was trying to get her back for being such a bitch when he did her ASOS haul.

tbf, she needed some of that sass throwing back from that vid

[Pleiadian Starseed]

Lady Fleur is in LA without "Bugsy" again! I just cannot get over the fact that she is without her baby for the second time in less than a month. It's so sad. I find it extremely upsetting. She can afford to take the baby with her and a nanny!! Someone commented on Danielle Manusutti disgusted at how she got a puppy when she knew she would be leaving it all the time and they were absolutely disgusted. Lady Fleur has the same her baby is just an accessory, something she can pick up and then leave for someone else to look after. She is likely to miss her first steps, her first words etc. When it comes to potty training someone else will be doing that for her whilst she is jet-setting. Fleur doesn't need to do these trips, she is choosing to. She is detached from 'Bugsy' I just don't understand why she doesn't take the baby with her! Sorry for the rant but it makes me so upset and sad for the baby

[Gurubydaygossiperby]

Seriously ... I wouldn't even leave my 5 month old puppy as much as she leaves River. This is important bonding and developmental time that she can never get back. Good thing they've loads of $ for therapy once that child is older

[koalah]

She's an odd one that Fleur. Guess having the baby didn't really change much with her lifestyle. She will for sure will be having another baby like clockwork at the 2 year mark because it's expected of her.

She had more interest for the yellow Chanel WoC when she unveiled it. I especially loved how on the trip back from LA she was pouting about how she didn't want to go back (sure in jest but how tone deaf). Then had to quickly say it would be nice to see the baby but in the shifty eyed Fleur manner - the same look she gets when people are talking and her eyes glaze over waiting for her turn to talk.

Countdown until this devolves into another 2-3 pages of the two camps discussing about how Fleur ditching her newborn baby to go on business trips is ok or not ok. That's the most interest that Fleur generates in this thread or her IG/video comments. There's already quite a bit of nastiness on her IG. Still boring af.

Btw time for a new thread? 45 pages.

[MariaRey1800___]

Lady Fleur is in LA without "Bugsy" again! I just cannot get over the fact that she is without her baby for the second time in less than a month. It's so sad. I find it extremely upsetting. She can afford to take the baby with her and a nanny!! Someone commented on Danielle Manusutti disgusted at how she got a puppy when she knew she would be leaving it all the time and they were absolutely disgusted. Lady Fleur has the same her baby is just an accessory, something she can pick up and then leave for someone else to look after. She is likely to miss her first steps, her first words etc. When it comes to potty training someone else will be doing that for her whilst she is jet-setting. Fleur doesn't need to do these trips, she is choosing to. She is detached from 'Bugsy' I just don't understand why she doesn't take the baby with her! Sorry for the rant but it makes me so upset and sad for the baby

I feel the same way every time I see her post lately. I think she’s going to alienate her whole audience that are mothers because I just can’t understand her wanting to leave her infant child so much.

[LaurieLaurie]

She will alienate mums. I’m on a parenting forum and I’d say 8/10 won’t leave their babies even for a few hours, there is always posts about Grandmas wanting to babysit and they recoil at the thought.
I think she only had the baby on the terms that she would travel without her, I’m speechless she flew to LA for a candle. She has countless expensive candles at home.

[al218]

I haven't watched since she got pregnant. I can't have children and I find her completely repulsive. Now, in the meantime, I love watching other channels with motherhood and moms especially Louise. Fleur and Elle are made for each other. Two spoiled ding bats.

[catskills]

I have to agree that Mike was pretty rude during the ASOS haul, dismissing everything she bought right away - those two are really made for each other! Although I like him from what we see, I definitely think that he's kind of a snob. I remember an old vlog from Texas (?) when Fleur mentioned that Mike was "unimpressed" about staying in an Holiday Inn and other stuff like that. But then again, he grew up like this and probably doesn't know any different - he didn't have to do well in school to become a director or a multi-million pound company...

And a bit off-topic: I'm not a mother (so according to Fleur, my opinion doesn't matter anyway ), but I'd like to have children in the future. Do you mums really don't want to leave your kids even for a few hours/a night to spend time with your partner or something like that? I'm not talking about Princess Fleur here, IMO she's really been away too much, it's more of a general question and I'm genuinely curious. My brother has a baby and he and my SIL do a lot of sports and stuff in our community, so my little nephew (1 year) spends several mornings/afternoons with our parents whom he adores and the occasional night at the weekend (not regularly). I just had some hope that with kids you would still be able to do some of the stuff you used to enjoy... I don't know - sorry for the off-topic rant!

[LaurieLaurie]

I have to agree that Mike was pretty rude during the ASOS haul, dismissing everything she bought right away - those two are really made for each other! Although I like him from what we see, I definitely think that he's kind of a snob. I remember an old vlog from Texas (?) when Fleur mentioned that Mike was "unimpressed" about staying in an Holiday Inn and other stuff like that. But then again, he grew up like this and probably doesn't know any different - he didn't have to do well in school to become a director or a multi-million pound company...

And a bit off-topic: I'm not a mother (so according to Fleur, my opinion doesn't matter anyway ), but I'd like to have children in the future. Do you mums really don't want to leave your kids even for a few hours/a night to spend time with your partner or something like that? I'm not talking about Princess Fleur here, IMO she's really been away too much, it's more of a general question and I'm genuinely curious. My brother has a baby and he and my SIL do a lot of sports and stuff in our community, so my little nephew (1 year) spends several mornings/afternoons with our parents whom he adores and the occasional night at the weekend (not regularly). I just had some hope that with kids you would still be able to do some of the stuff you used to enjoy... I don't know - sorry for the off-topic rant!

You definitely can enjoy a life outside of your children but flying so often without your very young baby is virtually unheard of.