I mean, you must not do that much reading about sexuality if you're going to point to that flawed study that Bailey himself doesn't even agree with.Booboo2 wrote:There have been legit scientific studies showing men who identity as bisexual are mainly aroused by men, so it’s not that weird for a gay guy to doubt a bisexual man. They use an instrument which attaches to the genitals to gauge arousal. I studied the psychology of sexuality, so I realize this is not common knowledge, but it’s something worth learning about.Deathsoul74 wrote:I’m honestly surprised Ryland wants to marry Shane despite him being paranoid Shane’s going to cheat on him with a woman. You could tell even now Ryland wishes he could convince Shane to come out as gay. I mean majority of gay men are biphobia and Ryland proved he was one early in the relationship.
In that lie detector video, Ryland also asked if Shane had fantasized about women since they had been together and Shane said no. They’ve been together for like what .. 2 or so years? A bit weird that a bisexual man wouldn’t have any fantasies about women for that long of a time period
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/do-bisexua ... lly-exist/
This is the article, actually based on science rather than people’s word.
The problem is that people seem to go off emotions rather than sexual response when asked about their sexuality. sexual orientation is about who you’re sexually attracted to, not “I like being around this person”. It’s literally who you’re most physically aroused by. People seem to like to change the definition and act like it’s about who you “love”, when that isn’t the scientific definition of sexual orientation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/23/maga ... xists.html
'At A.I.B.’s suggestion, Bailey did a second study in which he used more stringent criteria to find bisexual-identified test subjects. Instead of advertising in an alternative newspaper and gay magazines, Bailey’s team recruited men who placed online ads seeking sex with both members of a mixed-gender couple. The men also needed to have had romantic relationships with both men and women.
To Bailey’s surprise, the new study — published in 2011 and called “Sexual Arousal Patterns of Bisexual Men Revisited” — found that the bisexual men did in fact demonstrate “bisexual patterns of both subjective and genital arousal.” Their arousal pattern matched their professed orientation, and A.I.B., which had been criticized by some bisexual activists for working with Bailey, was vindicated.'