John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
i hope it's okay i made this! i'm just excited to see the section grow. gossip away!
~ english is not my first language ~
- Ovaryfruit
- Gossiper
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:32 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
Well done! Good name!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In my bunker awaiting Dramageddon 3.0
Re: John
thank you!!Ovaryfruit wrote:Well done! Good name!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
he sort of talked circles around paige- i don't necessarily blame her, but she didn't ask great questions either. but mostly he was, characteristically, evasive about every single thing. if you wanna see how creepy he acts when interacting directly with another human being, go ahead and check it out. but otherwise, there isn't much to see. it's just the same lies he's been telling this whole timeLeGarconBleu wrote:I missed petty Page's video, is it worth watching at this point?
Did he address the ingredients being absent at all? It all the blocking on Twitter?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
~ english is not my first language ~
- beahunny
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:37 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
Petty Paige did her best with the phone conversation but I don't think she was proper prepared for what she was getting into. I think she thought his lies were so absurd that they'd fall in on themselves and he wouldn't be able to explain them. I think she really underestimated his ability to bullshit. And to be honest, even though I saw through the load of tosh coming out his mouth, I can see how it could sound convincing if you don't know much about what he's talking about.
She needed to be harder on him and push him for details. She let him off with some half assed answers.
She needed to be harder on him and push him for details. She let him off with some half assed answers.
- LiddlePallid
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30233
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 668 times
- Been thanked: 4467 times
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
Ughhh I want someone that's going to be relentless with him - but then again he probably wouldn't agree to an interview with someone like that lol
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
marni wrote:Petty Paige did her best with the phone conversation but I don't think she was proper prepared for what she was getting into. I think she thought his lies were so absurd that they'd fall in on themselves and he wouldn't be able to explain them. I think she really underestimated his ability to bullshit. And to be honest, even though I saw through the load of tosh coming out his mouth, I can see how it could sound convincing if you don't know much about what he's talking about.
She needed to be harder on him and push him for details. She let him off with some half assed answers.
i think she made the mistake of assuming he was like, an empathetic human who feels shame/guilt or trips up. but he's a grade-a narcissist and she really just wasn't prepared- because no matter how crazy his lies look to us, if he can keep them (fairly) in line and say them with a straight face, he'll get away with it
~ english is not my first language ~
- LeGarconBleu
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:28 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
Ok thanks for the update guys.
I found this earlier, it might have been talked about before, it's to do with his return policy.
So according to the gov.uk site. Online retailers must give customers a minimum 14 day return policy from the date of the product arrival. They also must provide a list of info. Including shipping info, forms payment, etc etc. Looking at his website to me it looks like some of that is missing before you make a purchase.
I see the line about excluding items under £42, is this individual items? Is this why nothing is above £30?
Anyone with more details on UK Law, please chime in?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I found this earlier, it might have been talked about before, it's to do with his return policy.
So according to the gov.uk site. Online retailers must give customers a minimum 14 day return policy from the date of the product arrival. They also must provide a list of info. Including shipping info, forms payment, etc etc. Looking at his website to me it looks like some of that is missing before you make a purchase.
I see the line about excluding items under £42, is this individual items? Is this why nothing is above £30?
Anyone with more details on UK Law, please chime in?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
i think his makeup falls into the forty two pounds or less category, right? do you think that's per item, or per order?
~ english is not my first language ~
-
- Learner
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 10:26 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
But, but, but I haven't finished the last thread yet.bitchboy wrote:i hope it's okay i made this! i'm just excited to see the section grow. gossip away!
I'm too old for this shit!
- LeGarconBleu
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:28 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
So nothing above applies because he's under that mark?bitchboy wrote:i think his makeup falls into the forty two pounds or less category, right? do you think that's per item, or per order?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: John
that's how i understand it, at least. if anyone else has a different read, please feel free to correct me... politely, lolLeGarconBleu wrote:So nothing above applies because he's under that mark?bitchboy wrote:i think his makeup falls into the forty two pounds or less category, right? do you think that's per item, or per order?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by bitchboy on Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~ english is not my first language ~
-
- Informer
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 4:09 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
- LiddlePallid
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30233
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 668 times
- Been thanked: 4467 times
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
So he had to upload a 24 minute video talking about his fucking CHUBES again! And I loved his excuse for why he typed SERVER OVERLOAD on the front page lmao! "It wasn't loading the pictures so it made sense to let people know"
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
i even saw minions on twitter calling him out on the fake server overload (though they called it "a tease" lol), so i don't even know what he's trying to accomplish. there's no good reason to fake an error.LiddlePallid wrote:So he had to upload a 24 minute video talking about his fucking CHUBES again! And I loved his excuse for why he typed SERVER OVERLOAD on the front page lmao! "It wasn't loading the pictures so it made sense to let people know"
~ english is not my first language ~
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
Since the last thread got closed, I'll @ you here along with @Bbbaby. That was information that I found that was posted on twitter without credit to GG. I am entitled to feel however I want about that. If I want to be shady, that is my prerogative since that was my info reposted. Don't be surprised things get shady on a site dedicated to gossip. If that twitter user is a member of the board they should know to give credit because of the site history. I thought it was just a lurker stealing shit from here to gain a following.bitchboy wrote:i hope it's okay i made this! i'm just excited to see the section grow. gossip away!
- pradacandyxo
- Gossiper
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
I wonder if anyone will receive his scametics
"if these lips ain't sucking your dick than you don't have anything to say" - Trasha Paytas
-
- Debater
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:05 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
I checked his socialblade and he has started losing subscribers. I wonder why
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
all evidence points to the fact that he doesn't even have stock yet to get these things shipped to his "warehouse" (aka loft) and then out to every single person is going to take him a damn while, i'm sure. or he'll ship them straight from china and leave the usa customers with the import fees. what a nice guy.pradacandyxo wrote:I wonder if anyone will receive his scametics
~ english is not my first language ~
- dirtdiver
- Wallflower
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:34 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Chief Exaggeration Officer" Crookian - Part 5
I've been lurking here for a loooooong time, and I'm wondering if any legal action is being taken against John. I don't think there's any way of knowing until shit actually starts hitting the fan. I'm guessing he took ~dirty money, an ORIGINAL Krookian shade, off of his website because one of J*'s lawyer's contacted him. There are so many things he could get in legal trouble for that he's doing, I'm really just excited to see how this will end.
Also: even in the video he uploaded today, he couldn't pay for enough likes to combat all the dislikes. It's nearly half liked and half disliked.
Also: even in the video he uploaded today, he couldn't pay for enough likes to combat all the dislikes. It's nearly half liked and half disliked.