She just isn't very personable. I watched one of her streams and she was sniffing all over the place and every time she made a point you can tell she is a bit sadistic. Like she is relishing in it. IDK. I didn't like it. At least her voice isn't as annoying as the others.Vergie wrote:Not a fan of hers but her Kuckian videos are usually pretty good.yadayadayeah wrote:Oh, god. Margo? Talk about the bottom of the barrel.candybabe wrote:Hey guys,
Haven't been on gg in a while but this john kuckian drama is f ing gold. Lethal cosmetics is 'doing maintenance' atm so can't see their ingredients list. I honestly don't know how he can pull himself out of this one. When is Margo making a vid on this? Can not wait
John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
- candybabe
- Informer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Haha, how many times has he mentioned that steel bit? Probably a lie too to make the product look better than it is.marni wrote:Me_me666 wrote:It’s so funny how he started all of this on his channel by talking about the care he’s putting into the formulas he’s personally working on, and yet this seems to have transformed into him obsessing over minute details of packaging No one gives a shit if you hotstamped or screenprinted, just post the damn ingredients
And does anyone really need this steel bit he's added? Maybe I'm some kind of wizard but plastic's always done the trick fine by me?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Debater
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
“Nozzing~ zeyz luxury~ like “lump off steeel”...... by Kuckienne~”marni wrote:Me_me666 wrote:It’s so funny how he started all of this on his channel by talking about the care he’s putting into the formulas he’s personally working on, and yet this seems to have transformed into him obsessing over minute details of packaging No one gives a shit if you hotstamped or screenprinted, just post the damn ingredients
And does anyone really need this steel bit he's added? Maybe I'm some kind of wizard but plastic's always done the trick fine by me?
Re: John
Every time he mentions it I feel like I'm watching one of them infomercials where they're all struggling pouring pasta into a colander or something.candybabe wrote:Haha, how many times has he mentioned that steel bit? Probably a lie too to make the product look better than it is.marni wrote:Me_me666 wrote:It’s so funny how he started all of this on his channel by talking about the care he’s putting into the formulas he’s personally working on, and yet this seems to have transformed into him obsessing over minute details of packaging No one gives a shit if you hotstamped or screenprinted, just post the damn ingredients
And does anyone really need this steel bit he's added? Maybe I'm some kind of wizard but plastic's always done the trick fine by me?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"ARE YOU TIRED OF SPILLING YOUR PASTA EVERYWHERE!?"
No?
It feel like that.
"THIS WILL MAKE APPLICATION SO MUCH EASIER!"
Am I meant to be struggling putting lipstick on?
- candybabe
- Informer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Not even just that! He doesn’t even explain how it helps. Clearly just read somebody else’s blurb about their lipstick and thought “yeah I better do that too”marni wrote:Every time he mentions it I feel like I'm watching one of them infomercials where they're all struggling pouring pasta into a colander or something.candybabe wrote:Haha, how many times has he mentioned that steel bit? Probably a lie too to make the product look better than it is.marni wrote:Me_me666 wrote:It’s so funny how he started all of this on his channel by talking about the care he’s putting into the formulas he’s personally working on, and yet this seems to have transformed into him obsessing over minute details of packaging No one gives a shit if you hotstamped or screenprinted, just post the damn ingredients
And does anyone really need this steel bit he's added? Maybe I'm some kind of wizard but plastic's always done the trick fine by me?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"ARE YOU TIRED OF SPILLING YOUR PASTA EVERYWHERE!?"
No?
It feel like that.
"THIS WILL MAKE APPLICATION SO MUCH EASIER!"
Am I meant to be struggling putting lipstick on?
Oh Marc Jacobs uses small caps on the packaging “better do that as well”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
It also really creeps me out how much he relates this launch to it being his child. I understand that it's a really common phrase and but the way he uses it is just.... off.
"I feel like I've just given birth".
.... What?
I don't know maybe I'm being sensitive but between that and all the "innocence" talk in his launch video and that weird thing he has with Peppa Pig.... it just comes off as SO creepy.
"I feel like I've just given birth".
.... What?
I don't know maybe I'm being sensitive but between that and all the "innocence" talk in his launch video and that weird thing he has with Peppa Pig.... it just comes off as SO creepy.
-
- Learner
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
With the way he goes on and on about the packaging, and keeps saying “collection”, and can’t stop going on about how luxurious it all is...is he expecting people to display these crap little products like fine diamonds or something??
- candybabe
- Informer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Well it is made from the "finest ingredients" or so he says hahahatatortot20093 wrote:With the way he goes on and on about the packaging, and keeps saying “collection”, and can’t stop going on about how luxurious it all is...is he expecting people to display these crap little products like fine diamonds or something??
- SailorV1912
- Learner
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 8:27 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Oh my god he is digging himself more holes on Paiges livestream I am LIVING
- candybabe
- Informer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
This YouNow is hilarious... WTF John. You can't say it's a charity until you've registered it.
-
- Learner
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Gosh, how will us poor saps ever understand the grueling process he’s been through...the past ONE WHOLE YEAR to get this sh*t show plopped outcandybabe wrote:Well it is made from the "finest ingredients" or so he says hahahatatortot20093 wrote:With the way he goes on and on about the packaging, and keeps saying “collection”, and can’t stop going on about how luxurious it all is...is he expecting people to display these crap little products like fine diamonds or something??
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
This has been rehashed soooo much. He isn't committing charity fraud.candybabe wrote:This YouNow is hilarious... WTF John. You can't say it's a charity until you've registered it.
-
- Debater
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
Please tell me someone is recording this YouNow, I missed the beginning of it.
- candybabe
- Informer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
He's calling it a charity though... so he is. It's fraud to say a portion is going to the foundation when there is no evidence of the foundationyadayadayeah wrote:This has been rehashed soooo much. He isn't committing charity fraud.candybabe wrote:This YouNow is hilarious... WTF John. You can't say it's a charity until you've registered it.
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
From UK law:candybabe wrote:He's calling it a charity though... so he is. It's fraud to say a portion is going to the foundation when there is no evidence of the foundationyadayadayeah wrote:This has been rehashed soooo much. He isn't committing charity fraud.candybabe wrote:This YouNow is hilarious... WTF John. You can't say it's a charity until you've registered it.
"Every unincorporated charity and Charitable Company with a gross annual income of £5,000 or more must register with the Charity Commission. Once a charity reaches this threshold, it should register in the following financial year. Already registered charities below the £5,000 threshold will remain on the register."
He has a whole fiscal year to make a donation. The way he has it worded is that he is making the donation from a portion of the sale, not the customer. So he can donate a cent and be legally a-ok. It's painful reading those comments in the chat.
- candybabe
- Informer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
yadayadayeah wrote:From UK law:candybabe wrote:He's calling it a charity though... so he is. It's fraud to say a portion is going to the foundation when there is no evidence of the foundationyadayadayeah wrote:This has been rehashed soooo much. He isn't committing charity fraud.candybabe wrote:This YouNow is hilarious... WTF John. You can't say it's a charity until you've registered it.
"Every unincorporated charity and Charitable Company with a gross annual income of £5,000 or more must register with the Charity Commission. Once a charity reaches this threshold, it should register in the following financial year. Already registered charities below the £5,000 threshold will remain on the register."
He has a whole fiscal year to make a donation. The way he has it worded is that he is making the donation from a portion of the sale, not the customer. So he can donate a cent and be legally a-ok. It's painful reading those comments in the chat.
I think it's still shady tbh. Even if it isn't illegal, it's still misleading, do you not agree? He should register it whatever the legislation says
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
i don't think the issue with the kuckian foundation is that he's doing anything wrong now. i think the issue is more that no one who knows anything about the guy trusts him not to commit charity fraud someday- or at least use his charity to hide his wrongdoings somehow, etc etc etc
~ english is not my first language ~
Re: John "Kuckian SCAMetics" Kuckian - Part 4
It isn't misleading.... I knew he wasn't committing fraud from the start. At what point do people own their own ignorance? Margo is frothing in the mouth in the chat over this charity stuff, but she doesn't know shit. He can claim libel at this point because he has suffered business damages.candybabe wrote:yadayadayeah wrote:From UK law:candybabe wrote:He's calling it a charity though... so he is. It's fraud to say a portion is going to the foundation when there is no evidence of the foundationyadayadayeah wrote:This has been rehashed soooo much. He isn't committing charity fraud.candybabe wrote:This YouNow is hilarious... WTF John. You can't say it's a charity until you've registered it.
"Every unincorporated charity and Charitable Company with a gross annual income of £5,000 or more must register with the Charity Commission. Once a charity reaches this threshold, it should register in the following financial year. Already registered charities below the £5,000 threshold will remain on the register."
He has a whole fiscal year to make a donation. The way he has it worded is that he is making the donation from a portion of the sale, not the customer. So he can donate a cent and be legally a-ok. It's painful reading those comments in the chat.
I think it's still shady tbh. Even if it isn't illegal, it's still misleading, do you not agree? He should register it whatever the legislation says