Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

User avatar
Alkmy
Informer
Informer
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 8:27 pm
Has thanked: 753 times
Been thanked: 1739 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by Alkmy » Tue Jan 28, 2020 10:30 am

I’m pretty sure her 2 newest videos were prerecorded because her hair is freshly bleached currently... But her newest videos her roots are a foot long. So HEY SAM. SEE YOU TRYNNA BE SNEAKY and actually buying and reviewing during your “no buy” and then uploading the footage after the “no buy” is “over”
She’s pathetic. Why even fuss over a no buy if it isn’t even real. Just own the fact that you blow a million dollars a year on product to rot in your drawer
Maybe I’m wrong but surprised no one else has pointed this out yet.

User avatar
sofetchxox
Informer
Informer
Posts: 274
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 524 times
Been thanked: 540 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by sofetchxox » Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:23 pm

OOF comments on the new podcast video are ROUGH. People are pissed about how they responded to a commenter who wanted them to go more in depth or do some research on the last episode about cohabitating. I’m glad I wasn’t the only one who’s feeling that the podcast has turned into them rambling about their personal lives in a really vague way with no purpose. They used to at least do some basic research :roll:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
ilovepeachjuice
Talker
Talker
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:53 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by ilovepeachjuice » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:10 pm

Yeah they got kind of snippy at the end of the podcast saying that the comment that inspired it was insinuating that they didn't do "enough" as if they "owed" their listeners more than they got. But the original comment was pretty polite, just saying that there was an aspect of the topic they covered that they wished they had heard more about. They said that if they don't talk about a topic it's because they've intentionally chosen to not as if they've already thought of every single topic in existence and know which ones they want to address and which ones they don't want to and god forbid someone think of a facet of a topic that perhaps Sam and Alyssa didn't think of ahead of time

ppcrnshrmp
Stalker
Stalker
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:09 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by ppcrnshrmp » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:21 pm

They were so shady in the newest podcast episode. The cohabitating episode was 2 weeks ago; they had more than enough time to reply to that comment and get some clarity in a more private way but instead they read it, interpreted it wrong (OP said so herself), and then waited 2 weeks to make kind of a big deal about it and spin off of it into a whole rant about entitlement and oversharing. They contradicted themselves so much in the newest episode and made weird analogies that didn’t further their narrative at all. I feel like the podcast has just become an opportunity for them to talk about themselves rather than speak about things in a way that could actually benefit other people.

User avatar
fizzwizz12
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 980 times
Been thanked: 5884 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by fizzwizz12 » Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:14 pm

actually, from a business standpoint... since that's what they are using this platform as. they do need to cater to their listeners/viewers.
“I don't care what you are doing, so much as the idiotic way that you are doing it.”-vincent valentine

User avatar
sofetchxox
Informer
Informer
Posts: 274
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 524 times
Been thanked: 540 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by sofetchxox » Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:32 pm

:roll: She’s now addressing the comment again in the livestream she’s doing now just doubling down and not taking in any of the criticism and just purposefully ignoring the meaning of what people are saying. :roll: :roll: :roll:

this.on
Informer
Informer
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:15 pm
Has thanked: 3611 times
Been thanked: 290 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by this.on » Sat Feb 01, 2020 11:01 pm

She's so stupidly privileged, her live stream the other night is still bothering me. I cannot stand when she complains about how expensive it is to go to Whistler, but she wishes she could go there more.

Sam says it's expensive during the winter but she's staying at the FOUR SEASONS!
She said it's $300 for a room for the night in the summer and like $1200 in the winter. And then she quickly added 'oh but cheaper hotels are super expensive too'.


Whistler is a 2hr drive away, she could go for a day trip she's just lazy and entitled.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


gGuruStalker
Talker
Talker
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 1:28 pm
Has thanked: 901 times
Been thanked: 368 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by gGuruStalker » Sun Feb 02, 2020 2:18 am

She reeks of privilege and entitlement


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pea2324
Lurker
Lurker
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by Pea2324 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:31 am

this.on wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2020 11:01 pm
Sam says it's expensive during the winter but she's staying at the FOUR SEASONS!
She said it's $300 for a room for the night in the summer and like $1200 in the winter. And then she quickly added 'oh but cheaper hotels are super expensive too'.


Whistler is a 2hr drive away, she could go for a day trip she's just lazy and entitled.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Holy guacamole.. if you are shelling out 1200 a night for the four season AND complaining about the price, then you are just pain dumb, im sorry. Its clearly out of her comfort zone so she should get a cheaper hotel. There are people who make way more than her and wont bawk at the 1200/night price tag, like actual celebrities, which she is not.

I think being a BG, she got VIP treatment from brands on trips so she thinks she can afford that lifestyle on her own, or feels like she is worth that. I mean do you boo, but dont complain about 1200 bucks - no one is forcing you to do it.

User avatar
fizzwizz12
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 980 times
Been thanked: 5884 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by fizzwizz12 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:12 am

she goes to whistler to stay inside the hotel. waste of a trip.
“I don't care what you are doing, so much as the idiotic way that you are doing it.”-vincent valentine

this.on
Informer
Informer
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:15 pm
Has thanked: 3611 times
Been thanked: 290 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by this.on » Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:21 am

fizzwizz12 wrote:she goes to whistler to stay inside the hotel. waste of a trip.
She does a "hike" (ie walks into the treeline to pose naked for the gram) and then goes to the spa.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


milanese15
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 2180
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 602 times
Been thanked: 2799 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by milanese15 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:55 am

Pea2324 wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:31 am
this.on wrote:
Sat Feb 01, 2020 11:01 pm
Sam says it's expensive during the winter but she's staying at the FOUR SEASONS!
She said it's $300 for a room for the night in the summer and like $1200 in the winter. And then she quickly added 'oh but cheaper hotels are super expensive too'.


Whistler is a 2hr drive away, she could go for a day trip she's just lazy and entitled.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Holy guacamole.. if you are shelling out 1200 a night for the four season AND complaining about the price, then you are just pain dumb, im sorry. Its clearly out of her comfort zone so she should get a cheaper hotel. There are people who make way more than her and wont bawk at the 1200/night price tag, like actual celebrities, which she is not.

I think being a BG, she got VIP treatment from brands on trips so she thinks she can afford that lifestyle on her own, or feels like she is worth that. I mean do you boo, but dont complain about 1200 bucks - no one is forcing you to do it.
I think being rich has become a part of her identity, and in a kind of delusional way. She has a nice, comfortable upper middle class life in an expensive city. But she's definitely not the "CEO money" rich she likes to convince everyone (and herself) that she is. It's really crazy that she projects that image, considering it separates herself even more from her audience, and she's really not an aspirational figure. But I think it stems from her long standing, deep insecurities. It's what she clings onto in order to feel better about her life and the choices she's made. This is why, in her stupid "instagram vs reality" story, she said she had almost no money in her bank account while heading out on a brand trip and why she claims she wouldn't be able to pay her taxes if she stopped making videos. She's always spent all her money to appear or feel more successful than she is.

User avatar
fizzwizz12
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 980 times
Been thanked: 5884 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by fizzwizz12 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:10 am

this.on wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:21 am
fizzwizz12 wrote:she goes to whistler to stay inside the hotel. waste of a trip.
She does a "hike" (ie walks into the treeline to pose naked for the gram) and then goes to the spa.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
oh yes, the fake maxim photo style shoot she loves.

if only there was a decent tree well for her to fall into.
“I don't care what you are doing, so much as the idiotic way that you are doing it.”-vincent valentine

this.on
Informer
Informer
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:15 pm
Has thanked: 3611 times
Been thanked: 290 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by this.on » Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:50 pm

Why doesn't she just get into porn already? Image

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


User avatar
HoardganizedJen
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 11696
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:18 pm
Has thanked: 503 times
Been thanked: 5608 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by HoardganizedJen » Sun Feb 02, 2020 5:02 pm

this.on wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:50 pm
Why doesn't she just get into porn already?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Wow... at this point she's just asking for this. Sorry, y'all. Had to.

NSFW under the spoiler :lol:
Image

User avatar
Bonki
Informer
Informer
Posts: 292
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:01 pm
Has thanked: 359 times
Been thanked: 744 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by Bonki » Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:14 am

The open mouth has to stop, its not sexy and it isn't cute.
Also I dunno if this is how she edit the photo but her eyes look extremely weird, especially the white parts of them.

gGuruStalker
Talker
Talker
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 1:28 pm
Has thanked: 901 times
Been thanked: 368 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by gGuruStalker » Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:14 am

HoardganizedJen wrote:
this.on wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:50 pm
Why doesn't she just get into porn already?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Wow... at this point she's just asking for this. Sorry, y'all. Had to.

NSFW under the spoiler :lol:
Image
LMFAOOOOOOOOO I was going to say “quick someone photoshop a dick” ImageImageImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

this.on
Informer
Informer
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:15 pm
Has thanked: 3611 times
Been thanked: 290 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by this.on » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:17 pm

-Sam buys stupidly expensive ugly things so I checked the prices with shipping/customs and taxes to be sent to BC because they're absurdly expensive-

In the live last night Sam mentioned that she didn't buy the palm lamp that she'd been asking for everyone's opinion about on twitter (which is good, cuz it's ugly) but she said she didn't buy it because it's $500 and then mentioned that "it's not a big spend, like it's not $2000, but $500 is a lot for a lamp that I don't need". (I looked it up, it's actually a $600 lamp at $579 but with shipping and taxes it's a $700 lamp)
Image
Image
Image

I though she might actually be trying to learn some financial responsibility for a change, so of course she just mentioned on Twitter that she bought a $200 plant holder.
Image
Image
Image

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


User avatar
blindxfaith
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:12 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by blindxfaith » Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:18 pm

I haven't been on Guru Gossip in like a year so sorry if this has all been talked about to death. I had to come back to talk about how fucking annoying her podcast is!! I really liked it at first but my God, I can't handle it. It really seems like Sam just went along with the podcast idea to appease Alyssa because she offers very little worthwhile to the conversations. It's all just Alyssa filling up dead air with talk about the Cactus Club or living in Edmonton or Toronto ever again. WE GET IT!!!

User avatar
fizzwizz12
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 980 times
Been thanked: 5884 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by fizzwizz12 » Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:36 pm

that plant holder is 200 bucks? fuck i'm in the wrong business.
“I don't care what you are doing, so much as the idiotic way that you are doing it.”-vincent valentine

User avatar
sofetchxox
Informer
Informer
Posts: 274
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 524 times
Been thanked: 540 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by sofetchxox » Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:40 am

That lamp is absolutely vile lol imagine spending $700 on it :rofl:

User avatar
notmyvalentine213
Learner
Learner
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2020 5:16 pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by notmyvalentine213 » Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:11 pm

Girlfriend needs to get a fucking life. I remember her early days. She needs a new Batalash. Maybe she needs to partner up with Karissa Pukas (SocialEyes, till recently) so they can become a conglomerate of oversexualized femininity that poses as feminism lmao.

:cheers:

User avatar
Kazerella
Debater
Debater
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:05 pm
Has thanked: 649 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by Kazerella » Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:38 pm

FFS someone needs to suggest some dollar store crafts. 200$ to hold a plant? 😂

User avatar
smashthebox
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 2535
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:23 pm
Has thanked: 449 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by smashthebox » Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:08 pm

She's doing another live stream right now and she's just sitting there staring blankly at the comments. I also find it strange how youtubers pick and choose the questions that they answer. I see some good questions, but they never get answered. Her skin looks like shit on livestream too, very blotchy.

User avatar
fizzwizz12
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 980 times
Been thanked: 5884 times

Re: Samantha Ravndahl - Fauxtographer & Frenemy - Part 5

Post by fizzwizz12 » Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:17 pm

ANNNNND she removed it. i caught the last 30 seconds. she and her man talk the same way. her hands look better without the claws on the tips of the fingers... they look less deformed.
her hands just bug me.
“I don't care what you are doing, so much as the idiotic way that you are doing it.”-vincent valentine

Post Reply

Return to “Samantha Ravndahl”