SuperMaryFace - part 3

Locked
User avatar
Guest

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Guest »

When I first found out about Mary, her thread had about 5 pages. I never would have expected things to blow up the way they did haha.

TearyEyed
Talker
Talker
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:20 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by TearyEyed »

I don't think I insulted anyone. Im sorry if I did at any time or made any of you uncomfortable. I think we all made good points on both ends, thats why my responses were mixed. In the end I couldn't exactly side with either because of the past experiences/lies/faults.

Ive been stalking on the site since around page 30 on the first thread. Just didnt reply until a few pages ago :rofl: But for the most part, its been classy! :tu:

meowattack
Learner
Learner
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 12:00 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by meowattack »

Ok, sorry to carry over a now old conversation (even though the event happened like, last week) to the new thread but since I was brought up at the end of the last thread, I want to address it.

@BunnyRanger

Like I said, I purposely tried to stay away from super negative, insulting terms like "disgusting" when I wrote that paragraph because I didn't want you guys to think that I suddenly thought you all were scum for having different opinions. However, I was annoyed so I can understand that I came off a little rude. As NimuNimu pointed out, there was alot of newcomers and a lot of people saying different variations of why they didn't agree with what happened. Also, like you said, stuff doesn't always translate very well through the internet. So, taking all that into consideration, I was mostly bothered by some of the stuff the newbies were saying and I'm sure I probably took some other comments incorrectly as well. It happens, it's the internet. I didn't mean to imply that you all thought she deserved to harassed or assaulted, I certainly don't think that at all. The few of you that have been repeatedly commenting since the beginning have all been very nice and respectful and I think we all stand for the same things in relation to women's rights and I've always thought that was great. I did see a few comments that bothered me because they seemed to imply that the way she was dressing was wrong and that she was a slut or something (sorry, those comments are deeply buried now, I can't be bothered to find them) but the people who said that were random commenters, I think.

I think everyone got pretty worked up over that topic because, for once, it brought about two very different sets of opinions so I do recognize that I probably came off a little rude. I probably should have been more careful with my wording and not lumped everyone who had the opposite opinion into one group but it's not always easy to keep track of who's who when I'm just reading through the buttloads of comments that are added each day.

Also, sorry if I also came off as rude saying that you were making a subliminal comment. I was aware that my previous paragraph was very "in your face" that's why when I saw your comment, I felt it might be about me. Although you were not directly "calling me out" you did say that what I had written had annoyed you and honestly, I'd rather you just call me out on my shit than mention it in passing. If you disagree with me, then tell me!

Anyway, hopefully maybe this cleared it up a little bit! Either way, it's in the past now anyway, right? I don't think you all are assholes who think rape is okay or something. You guys have continuously impressed me with your thoughts on things and after I wrote that paragraph, I saw a lot of the regular commenters come forward and explicitly say that they did NOT agree with the woody show, so I was definitely more or less just referring to the random stragglers who rolled in and said their piece and then left.

User avatar
CaptainCrowbar
Learner
Learner
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:56 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by CaptainCrowbar »

(from the prior thread)
Lambchop wrote:Ken probably does have friends back home but since they're in the bible belt, what if they happen to be racist/homophobic/sexist and constantly make awful comments? Mary will lose her mind.
HA HA HA Image
The Thunder from Asunder

MakeupQueen
Informer
Informer
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:52 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by MakeupQueen »

CaptainCrowbar wrote:(from the prior thread)
Lambchop wrote:Ken probably does have friends back home but since they're in the bible belt, what if they happen to be racist/homophobic/sexist and constantly make awful comments? Mary will lose her mind.
HA HA HA Image
She'll only lose her mind on the internet because in real life she doesn't give a crap. She even joins in sometimes (ex: the video of her saying "retarded" despite non-stop preaching of how no one should ever say that) After all, she chose Ken. If it did really bother her so much then she wouldn't be with him.

User avatar
Nintendo Bunny
Learner
Learner
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Nintendo Bunny »

Ah maybe the "gross" comment was from me? I said in the last thread:
Someone tweeted this thread at the radio show and they retweeted it. Most posts here have been legitimate, fact based critisisms and to be backed by this mean spirited radio host is gross. They used Encyclopedia Dramatica as a source. That's just embarrassing.
I meant it in the crude way and not the "nerds are gross" stereotype way. Not trying to attack or offend anyone here. I didn't want this thread to be known to be a platform for them. I just think the message they were trying to send is completely different than what we've collectively agreed upon. That's what I meant when I then mentioned that they had used Encyclopedia Dramatica as another "source." I hope that makes sense. It was like our credibly was being mocked when someone took Encyclopedia Dramatica and the GG threads as truth at the same time. "If they believed Encyclopedia Dramatica, they'll believe anything those bored bitches will say." That's what I believe people were thinking at least. =|

User avatar
bluhbluh
Learner
Learner
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 7:52 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by bluhbluh »

''I watched this Woody show interview and Mary's crying video. Even though I agree with some people the interview was beyond rude, I can't feel sorry for Mary. I can't listen to her saying that ''she was self conscious about her body and her birthmarks as a teenager'' and look at those hundred nude photos she did at the same time. From what I've read form her old Model Mayhem accounts I couldn't see any of the problems she mentioned she was having. Mentioning floods in Sydney was totally irrelevant too, and she said that only to get more sympathy for people. Like she noticed herself, in her video, this Woody show thing has almost no subscribers, and if she was mature enough she would just totally ignore them, since these videos barely get any views. BUT NO, since she is Mary she had to kick-start the whole thing, and made such bigger issue out of it than it actually is, preaching about all those body shaming values she likes so much. The only reason these guys interviewed her, and used Encyclopedia Dramatica site is to show her lies. I'm pretty sure they've done some reading about her, possibly form this forum, knew she will be at the Star wars celebration, and deliberately made fun of her. Was it fun? No. Did she deserve it? Yes. I'm sure, if some other woman was big chested and dressed exactly as Mary, they would just ignore her, but they knew about all the controversies behind SuperMaryFace, picked her for interview on purpose, and asked all those questions on purpose. For me, who knows about her lies it was entertaining to watch, for those who still believe Mary is a goddess - not so much, and we can see that in the comments from her ''kickass supportive YouTube community'' (as she said on her Twitter) asking these people to kill themselves and wishing their families to burn to death. There you go, Mary and her Fanbase at their best. Seriously, I can't feel sorry at all for a manipulative liar.''

That's the post I've made about the whole situation, so I was one of the people, who said Mary deserved it. I'm not gone, I'm still here, I read this topic regularly, I just don't post frequently.

I don't agree with sexual harassment and abuse, women should be free to wear whatever they want, even if it's cleavage showing tank top and super short jeans. However, if you do it on purpose, your every single video has a thumbnail of your body in bikini, and you dare to say you're not doing it on purpose, then you're just a plain hypocrite. When a random person watches the woody show video with Mary, then they will feel sorry for her, cause these guys were rude to her, and that's a normal reaction, but like I said, I just can't get rid of the feeling they picked her for interview on purpose, that they've read stuff about her on the Internet, watched her videos, and based on all that approached her with those questions. She is a walking contradiction, that's why I don't feel sorry for her, I just can't. If she had some balls she would say something like ''yeah, I wear these clothes to show off my cleavage/to feel sexy/to catch the attention, because I'm sorry, but that's what many women are trying to achieve when you're big chested lady wearing a tank top (because this is what I'm doing :P), and on top of that, she should have just ignored these guys. Seriously, barely anyone watches them ,their videos have like 1000 views each, I've never even heard of them, and I probably wouldn't if it wasn't for Mary. I also still believe, that she did make a huge deal out if it FOR NO GOOD REASON. They are just a bunch of idiots, you just don't poke shit, cause it will stink even more. Compared to her fanbase, they are totally insignificant, and carrying on with this argument ping-pong was totally unnecessary.

It might seem very harsh, but if you do stupid things, then karma will definitely get you.

User avatar
Sarameingott

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Sarameingott »

CaptainCrowbar wrote:(from the prior thread)
Lambchop wrote:Ken probably does have friends back home but since they're in the bible belt, what if they happen to be racist/homophobic/sexist and constantly make awful comments? Mary will lose her mind.
HA HA HA Image
That is one sexy gif.

User avatar
VeniVediAmavi
Learner
Learner
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:27 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by VeniVediAmavi »

SuperMaryFace @SuprMaryFace · 15 Std. Vor 15 Stunden
To my Baltimore spiders: please please please be safe

Ah...and what about the rest, the "non spiders?", you dumb hypocrite?
:x

User avatar
Sarameingott

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Sarameingott »

So when I google supermaryface, the first suggestion I get (without looking this up before) is supermaryface breast implants. Does that mean most people who search supermaryface want to know if she has fake breasts?

The first thing you get is encyclopedia dramatica, some guru gossip links, but also this:

http://uyac.com.au/bog/2015/04/supermar ... y-and-shit -> A site with pictures of Mary and the text: ''supermaryface @sprmaryface has large tits and dresses up in cosplay and shit on the internet so we can jack off and not give a fuck. stolen from instagram''

Also found this:
http://www.byroncrawford.com/2015/04/ra ... yface.html -> The RackRadar... :? :? :? also with a bunch of pictures.

These sites are just like ''the dirty'' site. I'm sure there are many more. Must be tiring to have so many sites dedicated to drooling over your chest. But then again, she is providing them with a lot of pictures. Not saying she deserves it, I think these sites are disgusting, BUT she does have a lot of bikini/sexy/boobs pictures.

With the ''breast implants'' suggestion you also get a lot of ''porny'' sites and breast augmentation sites with the supermaryface in the description. Does that mean someone is going online, visiting these sites as user supermaryface or is this just google adding random words together?

Like this:
Image

She was also mentioned on a pro anorexia site, but that link doesn't work anymore: Image

TearyEyed
Talker
Talker
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:20 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by TearyEyed »

@Sarameingott: I always wondered why she never addressed any of those sites. There are so many of those sites with her name associated with them in Google searches. Most if the sites deal with pornography, pornstars or have pornographic ads/links. I know she Google's her name otherwise she wouldnt have found most of the sites she was against (knowing her fans didnt find them for her first). Those sites, especially the first one's quote, are exactly the kinds of pages you come across googling her considering the speculation of her nudes/implants. One of the first questions, if they dont already know, are directed at her boobs. Then the people defending her (normally not the spiders who watch her videos) are usually older men who fit her 'rape culture' stereotype. Its kind of sad to me.

Even though Im sure shes aware of these sites, this site still seems to be the most harmful to her because its not hate based criticism. Most of the forum is fact based and observations. The other slander sites are easy to ignore so she ignores this horny guys just ogling her pics, but if they get out of control she'll bring attention to them.
Its actually rarer to find a site of fans. And impossible to find a site or group of devoted logical fans.

Edit: I wonder if LA got to her or if she was always like that. She seemed so fun and laid back in the beginning. Actually relatable, and self assured. Maybe living in a smaller town could help her get in touch with who she is. I still wish the best for her. I cant wish a bad future on anyone.

Eastsiderider
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 8:47 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Eastsiderider »

~Bookmarking~

User avatar
Guest

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Guest »

Sarameingott wrote:So when I google supermaryface, the first suggestion I get (without looking this up before) is supermaryface breast implants. Does that mean most people who search supermaryface want to know if she has fake breasts?

The first thing you get is encyclopedia dramatica, some guru gossip links, but also this:

http://uyac.com.au/bog/2015/04/supermar ... y-and-shit -> A site with pictures of Mary and the text: ''supermaryface @sprmaryface has large tits and dresses up in cosplay and shit on the internet so we can jack off and not give a fuck. stolen from instagram''

Also found this:
http://www.byroncrawford.com/2015/04/ra ... yface.html -> The RackRadar... :? :? :? also with a bunch of pictures.

These sites are just like ''the dirty'' site. I'm sure there are many more. Must be tiring to have so many sites dedicated to drooling over your chest. But then again, she is providing them with a lot of pictures. Not saying she deserves it, I think these sites are disgusting, BUT she does have a lot of bikini/sexy/boobs pictures.

With the ''breast implants'' suggestion you also get a lot of ''porny'' sites and breast augmentation sites with the supermaryface in the description. Does that mean someone is going online, visiting these sites as user supermaryface or is this just google adding random words together?

Like this:
Image

She was also mentioned on a pro anorexia site, but that link doesn't work anymore: Image
My lord, the photo from the second link with her in the pink sweater looks freaky. Mary really shouldn't wear a push-up bra since her boobs are already so big, it's incredibly disproportionate! My back hurts just looking at her haha. Honestly, in my humble opinion, her body would be much more attractive with her natural breast size.

And yeah, the sites themselves are fucked up, but seeing all the photos together in one place really shows JUST how many sexy photos she has. Oh wait, they're not meant to be sexual. Except she's secure with her sexuality. But she's only dressed that way because it's hot. *sigh* oh Mary.

Martasnos
Lurker
Lurker
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:34 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Martasnos »

Hi, I've been lurking for a while and finally decided to make an account :)
I know this is a bit OT but she made the Teatox video private... :roll:

MakeupQueen
Informer
Informer
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:52 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by MakeupQueen »

She just wants to hide the fact that she was sponsored because she wrote several comments on the video telling her fans that she wasn't and did the video because they asked her to but when you go to famebit.com she's listed as the last paid sponsorship from the company. I really don't understand why she goes out of her way to lie.... why not just say NOTHING?

User avatar
SuperSmashPeach
Master Gossiper
Master Gossiper
Posts: 2187
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:14 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by SuperSmashPeach »

Is she buying some of her stuff on etsy? she's wearing a pokemon squirtle shirt in one of the links provided and there's an etsy shop selling the same shirt. the seller had terrible reviews.

also, i know this is kinda unfair because it's not her fault, but i really dislike the big moles on her belly and chest area. i think they're worse than her boobs. :|

User avatar
Sarameingott

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Sarameingott »

Alcana wrote:also, i know this is kinda unfair because it's not her fault, but i really dislike the big moles on her belly and chest area. i think they're worse than her boobs. :|
It's a matter of taste. I personally don't like or dislike moles. I have talked negatively about her looks in the first thread I believe, but I'm not going to do that anymore, because it's not important. I can't stop others from doing so. And I'm not saying you're a bad person if you do, but like I said, I don't think it's important or adds anything to the discussion.

I do want to compliment her looks, If I mean it. And I gotta say, her ''joker look'' really impresses me. In her own joker selfies she looks amazing in my opinion. The professional photo's are going to be even better. I also think it's really cool that she's actually doing a shoot where she doesn't look ''pretty'', like she said. She really meant it this time. So props to her. I think she looks especially good in the first picture of the first row and the second picture from the second row. I think because of the lips, I dunno. Really creepy, but good creepy.

Image

Image

User avatar
Nimu Nimu

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Nimu Nimu »

Sarameingott wrote: I do want to compliment her looks, If I mean it. And I gotta say, her ''joker look'' really impresses me. In her own joker selfies she looks amazing in my opinion. The professional photo's are going to be even better. I also think it's really cool that she's actually doing a shoot where she doesn't look ''pretty'', like she said. She really meant it this time. So props to her. I think she looks especially good in the first picture of the first row and the second picture from the second row. I think because of the lips, I dunno. Really creepy, but good creepy.

Image

Image
How curious! The one time she isn't pouting and/or contorting her body like a broken mannequin she actually looks really good. Postively hideous, but in a "Wow you're spot on with your rendition" kind of way. Color me impressed, Mary. I tip my wig to you.

User avatar
Clover la BonBon
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1458
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:09 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Clover la BonBon »

Phew...

I read through all the threads. That was hard going haha!

Couldn't believe Mary had a section, I have only just subbed to her on Youtube as I love finding cosplayers on Youtube. I was, in all honesty, not that impressed with some of her videos. However I enjoyed her Poison Ivy so carried on watching.

After reading here, wow couldn't believe some of the stuff you guys have found, well done :tu: . Also didn't know she did a video with Keira, I sub to her too and somehow missed it along the way. Did feel bad about her box after all the thought Keira put in :(

Anyway, carry on and I'll pop back again soon!

Eastsiderider
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 8:47 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: SuperMaryFace - part 3

Post by Eastsiderider »

Okaaay, she finally did something that doesn't depend on cleavage, spine twitching and trout mouth. Good. How she looks so incredibly different in those joker photos, is it just the white face paint? Some kind of prosthetic? Her nose looks very different :P Yeah if I did not know it was Mary I would've not guessed lol. Esp the one from the side, looks completely different. But nice to see at least some one embrace Leto's Joker since it feels like everyone hates on it like there's no tomorrow.

Locked

Return to “MaryMakingIt”