lightrain wrote:Might be an unpopular opinion, but focusing so much on diagnostic terms and whether these are triggered by emotional or biological reasons isn't really for the best, and not exactly going to be valid considering. All we can speculate on is how Lydia constantly changes her story to fit a narrative, one minute she's impoverished, homeless, the next she's Summering in the Italian family home and carrying on the tradition of Cartier watches. Lydia for whatever reason seems to idolise her father and his family, from them being more interesting due to having Iranian & Italian heritage (seriously), to being better, kinder people simply because they have the ability to purchase material goods, and this is seen as a shared interest. It's easy to idolise a family who you only see occasionally, who shows you a "nicer" more luxe life,as opposed to the experience of day in day out parenting which wont be all sunshine and rainbows. Her comments about the living arrangements at her mum's just came off as really tactless, as though, big empty house is somehow better. Having your own house, your own "box room' is a much more relaxing, private and stable environment than the many kids who would have had to share their room with siblings, maybe even other relatives, and also raising the point that currently there are many children living in temp. accommodation like Bed and Breakfasts. It's like that woman in the Addam's family who set her house on fie because she got the wrong doll as a child, get a grip. Using your audience as a way to slag of your private figure mother in public, relating always to material wealth with passive aggressive sponsored posts and tweets comes off as being the badder person here. If there was emotional abuse at play or relative poverty, then this doesn't get translated in posts that put down her mum because she had a small bedroom, or never taught her about a luxury skincare regime.
I don’t think that you make a valid point. I’ll gladly leave the clinical diagnosis and clinical terms out of the conversation. I also appreciate some of us who are not necessarily medically qualified but have had first hand experience with suspected or diagnosed cluster b personalities (borderline, narcissist, instrionic, antisocial, etc) find lydl’s behaviour and lies rather familiar and triggering. She has sparked a conversation on mental health issues, for sure. But I agree that we are running on what she chooses to portray, speculations and suspicions, so there’s that.
Quite strange that she would find the material that is being edited on her behalf okay though. And the shameless self-congratulating tweets!!!
She is certainly vain and conceited with a penchat for hard-to-keep-up-with lies, and that doesn’t need to be defined medically or diagnosed by a professional.
Although quite a fertile ground for vain people and avid consumers, creative industries such fashion and makeup are about art, skills and expression. Lydle represents none of the latter. She is just cog in the wheel. Another face for hyper-consumerism. Beyond the shallowness and insipidity, there is a deeper conversation to be had. Yet these people have such a reach through their platform which is what alarms me as well as frustrates me. One has to make a living but these are selling out and setting worrying exemples.
Anyway, I don’t like what I see of lydle. So based on what she puts out there, I’ll say that, in my books, she’s indeed a conceited a**h**e