Most Attractive YouTubers

[c_boots]

I think Youtube has a way of making almost anyone seem attractive, because no other platform out there really takes a popular person in the media and makes them so relatable and personal to the viewer. And its probably how so many people who just seem average looking and common can skyrocket to internet fame while they wouldn't likely be noticed nearly as much in the outside world.

[lotus]

^ yea I agree because the biggest names out there like dulce nguerriero carlibel Andreaschoice jlovesmac- if we seen them walking past us and didn't know who they were we probably wouldn't do a double take because they're all very very average at best.
And that desired beauty girl most of y'all posted looks like an ad for plastic surgery - and I never heard of that kalel girl but I think she is pretty. And a lot of the other girls posted here are much prettier than the big names !!

[whocares]

I think mishyswords is beautiful.

[AwkwardsWhatIAimFor]

Summer Kellsey is absolutely gorgeous.

[canachi]

I was simply saying the youtubers in this thread should be what society agrees is attractive, not outlier individual tastes

Sorry to bring this argument back up but what exactly do you think "society" would class as attractive? Definitions of beauty will be different depending on where in the world you're from. I'm pretty sure Pewdiepie fits the western stereotype of attractive. (Tall, blonde hair, blue eyes, healthy weight). He fits the description of plenty of people's ideal man, looks wise at least.

There isn't one universal idea of beauty, everyone's taste is different. So it's kind of dumb to tell people they should only be posting what society thinks is attractive. Also this thread would be super boring if everyone said they liked the same people

[senpai]

I was simply saying the youtubers in this thread should be what society agrees is attractive, not outlier individual tastes

Sorry to bring this argument back up but what exactly do you think "society" would class as attractive? Definitions of beauty will be different depending on where in the world you're from. I'm pretty sure Pewdiepie fits the western stereotype of attractive. (Tall, blonde hair, blue eyes, healthy weight). He fits the description of plenty of people's ideal man, looks wise at least.

There isn't one universal idea of beauty, everyone's taste is different. So it's kind of dumb to tell people they should only be posting what society thinks is attractive. Also this thread would be super boring if everyone said they liked the same people

Pewdiepie is 5'9. He is not tall.

[Babu93]

Ingrid, Niomi and Lee Newton are the first three that spring to mind.

Not that I see much of the first two now that I've cleansed myself of the vapid Gleam team and their LA pals.

[Guest]

Michael Aranda. His voice, his hands, his laugh, his arms, his skintone, his laughter lines...and he has rather pointy canines. AND he seems like a really decent person.

[Username]

I was simply saying the youtubers in this thread should be what society agrees is attractive, not outlier individual tastes

Sorry to bring this argument back up but what exactly do you think "society" would class as attractive?

I meant what society generally agrees on. But specifically in this case I was referring to the most elite level of looks. I acknowledge people have different tastes, but since the title of this thread is "Most attractive youtubers", I was expecting people to post pictures of youtubers with the most extreme levels of beauty. This thread isn't titled "Attractive youtubers", it's titled "MOST attractive youtubers". Attractiveness is subjective only when the person has a moderate (or below) level of beauty. The top 1% of beauties are nearly unanimous. Pewdiepie does not qualify because his looks are not extreme enough.

Definitions of beauty will be different depending on where in the world you're from.

They're not THAT different among cultures. Cross culturally, the most attractive people would be viewed as attractive in pretty much every part of the world. Although there are individual preferences, there is still a general agreement on what is beautiful and what isn't.

I'm pretty sure Pewdiepie fits the western stereotype of attractive. (Tall, blonde hair, blue eyes, healthy weight). He fits the description of plenty of people's ideal man, looks wise at least.

You just described his coloring, that does not prove anything. There is nothing extraordinary about his facial features. Being blond and blue-eyed ALONE does not make anyone attractive. In fact, most people agree most blond haired, blue-eyed people are VERY average-looking. It's only the most attractive ones that get all the attention.

There isn't one universal idea of beauty, everyone's taste is different.

Everyone's tastes aren't THAT different when it comes to the most extreme end of beauty. As mentioned, this thread isn't titled "Attractive youtubers", it's titled "MOST attractive youtubers". By posting pictures of youtubers that have pedestrian-level beauty defeats the purpose of this thread.

So it's kind of dumb to tell people they should only be posting what society thinks is attractive. Also this thread would be super boring if everyone said they liked the same people

You are misunderstanding. I'm not trying to tell people what they can or cannot find attractive. This thread isn't about attractiveness, it's about the highest level of attractiveness. (or at least that's how I interpreted this thread) There is barely any disagreement in the top 1% of looks.

[supernovs]

I have no life, so I thought it would be fun to see which YTers we all fancy. I may be forgetting someone, but my picks are:

^I think the person who started this thread wanted us to share who we find attractive and share individual preferences not just the 1% most extreme end of beauty.

[Hippo]

I was simply saying the youtubers in this thread should be what society agrees is attractive, not outlier individual tastes

Sorry to bring this argument back up but what exactly do you think "society" would class as attractive?

I meant what society generally agrees on. But specifically in this case I was referring to the most elite level of looks. I acknowledge people have different tastes, but since the title of this thread is "Most attractive youtubers", I was expecting people to post pictures of youtubers with the most extreme levels of beauty. This thread isn't titled "Attractive youtubers", it's titled "MOST attractive youtubers". Attractiveness is subjective only when the person has a moderate (or below) level of beauty. The top 1% of beauties are nearly unanimous. Pewdiepie does not qualify because his looks are not extreme enough.

Definitions of beauty will be different depending on where in the world you're from.

They're not THAT different among cultures. Cross culturally, the most attractive people would be viewed as attractive in pretty much every part of the world. Although there are individual preferences, there is still a general agreement on what is beautiful and what isn't.

I'm pretty sure Pewdiepie fits the western stereotype of attractive. (Tall, blonde hair, blue eyes, healthy weight). He fits the description of plenty of people's ideal man, looks wise at least.

You just described his coloring, that does not prove anything. There is nothing extraordinary about his facial features. Being blond and blue-eyed ALONE does not make anyone attractive. In fact, most people agree most blond haired, blue-eyed people are VERY average-looking. It's only the most attractive ones that get all the attention.

There isn't one universal idea of beauty, everyone's taste is different.

Everyone's tastes aren't THAT different when it comes to the most extreme end of beauty. As mentioned, this thread isn't titled "Attractive youtubers", it's titled "MOST attractive youtubers". By posting pictures of youtubers that have pedestrian-level beauty defeats the purpose of this thread.

So it's kind of dumb to tell people they should only be posting what society thinks is attractive. Also this thread would be super boring if everyone said they liked the same people

You are misunderstanding. I'm not trying to tell people what they can or cannot find attractive. This thread isn't about attractiveness, it's about the highest level of attractiveness. (or at least that's how I interpreted this thread) There is barely any disagreement in the top 1% of looks.

Well, someone's a bit obsessive.

[Username]

^^ I like to address every point. That's just me.

[Guest]

Username: there's a difference between "attractiveness" and "beauty".

In fact, most people agree most blond haired, blue-eyed people are VERY average-looking.

Do they? And from where has this fact been taken?

I'm not even gonna bother with the rest of your post.

[Izabella]

I think pewdiepie is really fucking good looking in my eyes, I'd totally go for him. AND he's probably more attractive then 98% of all youtubers. No one here is a Victoria Secret or Calvin Klein model. Besides, like supernovs said, it's posting who WE fancy.

Everyone's tastes aren't THAT different when it comes to the most extreme end of beauty.

Not true, many people think Megan Fox is a goddess while others think she's gross and scary looking.
A lot of people find Jennifer Lawrence or Emma Stone beautiful and many other people find them very average looking.
Same goes with Harry Styles, people are obsessed while others (myself and all my friends included) think he looks like a rat.
Same thing about Cara Delevigne, I think she looks atrocious but apparently others would kill to look like her?

The only case where majority of people find someone attractive is if they have a symmetrical face and follow the golden ratio rule, which is rare. But it really comes down to personal preferences.

[Username]

Username: there's a difference between "attractiveness" and "beauty".

In fact, most people agree most blond haired, blue-eyed people are VERY average-looking.

Do they? And from where has this fact been taken?

By going by people's reaction to the average blue-eyed blond. They have plain faces by any standard. They don't get much attention from the opposite sex, only the most attractive ones do. You're thinking of only the upper echelon of blue eyed blonds.

[Username]

I think pewdiepie is really fucking good looking in my eyes, I'd totally go for him. AND he's probably more attractive then 98% of all youtubers. No one here is a Victoria Secret or Calvin Klein model. Besides, like supernovs said, it's posting who WE fancy.

Everyone's tastes aren't THAT different when it comes to the most extreme end of beauty.

Not true, many people think Megan Fox is a goddess while others think she's gross and scary looking.

That's because they're only seeing post-plastic surgery Megan Fox. Most people have no clue what she looked like until Transformers. Pre-surgery and pre-fame Megan Fox was undoubtedly an attractive girl. 99% of people will look at the pic below and agree that is an attractive girl. She might not be their favorite, but the beauty is obvious. Pic is from 2004, 16 year old Megan.

A lot of people find Jennifer Lawrence or Emma Stone beautiful and many other people find them very average looking.
Same goes with Harry Styles, people are obsessed while others (myself and all my friends included) think he looks like a rat.
Same thing about Cara Delevigne, I think she looks atrocious but apparently others would kill to look like her?

But none of the people you mentioned possess extreme beauty. Their looks are subjective because they fall outside of the top 1%. They're all normal-looking people with mastermind PR behind them, especially Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone. Many guys like them because they are attractive in an attainable way, not intimidatingly gorgeous. Fame can really elevate someone's looks that otherwise wouldn't have.

The only case where majority of people find someone attractive is if they have a symmetrical face and follow the golden ratio rule, which is rare. But it really comes down to personal preferences.

The whole symmetry = beauty is BS spouted the media. Symmetry has very little effect on beauty as long as a face isn't noticeably asymmetrical. Nobody's face is perfectly symmetrical and even if it was, the difference in beauty is negligible.

[Izabella]

I'm talking about Megan Fox post-surgery. I find her stunning while others find her scary, in my opinion she still has one of the prettiest faces in Hollywood but others don't agree

No one in the youtube world is the "top 1%" .. there are no Adriana Limas and David Beckhams wasting their life on youtube, the point of this post is for us to name who we find attractive out of these people. And to call someone wrong for mentioning pewdiepie is really silly considering this whole post is subjective and opinion/preference - based.

Some people find him attractive, and some don't. We all don't have the same tastes. Can we just leave it at that and move on? If you would like to start a thread called "Out of the 1% of extreme beauties in the world, are any of them on youtube?" then by all means go ahead, but that's not what this thread it really about..

[Username]

I'm talking about Megan Fox post-surgery. I find her stunning while others find her scary, in my opinion she still has one of the prettiest faces in Hollywood but others don't agree

The ones who find her scary are looking at her overly-done plastic face, scary harsh eyebrows and makeup. They know nothing of pre-fame natural Megan Fox, an undeniable beauty, even to them.

No one in the youtube world is the "top 1%" .. there are no Adriana Limas and David Beckhams wasting their life on youtube, the point of this post is for us to name who we find attractive out of these people. And to call someone wrong for mentioning pewdiepie is really silly considering this whole post is subjective and opinion/preference - based.

I'm not wrong for thinking pewdiepie is not on an elite level of looks. People can find whatever they want attractive. But to be in the top league requires a majority agreement, which he is not.

Some people find him attractive, and some don't. We all don't have the same tastes. Can we just leave it at that and move on? If you would like to start a thread called "Out of the 1% of extreme beauties in the world, are any of them on youtube?" then by all means go ahead, but that's not what this thread it really about..

I agree, can we just move on? This debate ended a page ago but the person above brought it up again.

[Hippo]

I think pewdiepie is really fucking good looking in my eyes, I'd totally go for him. AND he's probably more attractive then 98% of all youtubers. No one here is a Victoria Secret or Calvin Klein model. Besides, like supernovs said, it's posting who WE fancy.

Everyone's tastes aren't THAT different when it comes to the most extreme end of beauty.

Not true, many people think Megan Fox is a goddess while others think she's gross and scary looking.

That's because they're only seeing post-plastic surgery Megan Fox. Most people have no clue what she looked like until Transformers. Pre-surgery and pre-fame Megan Fox was undoubtedly an attractive girl. 99% of people will look at the pic below and agree that is an attractive girl. She might not be their favorite, but the beauty is obvious. Pic is from 2004, 16 year old Megan.

A lot of people find Jennifer Lawrence or Emma Stone beautiful and many other people find them very average looking.
Same goes with Harry Styles, people are obsessed while others (myself and all my friends included) think he looks like a rat.
Same thing about Cara Delevigne, I think she looks atrocious but apparently others would kill to look like her?

But none of the people you mentioned possess extreme beauty. Their looks are subjective because they fall outside of the top 1%. They're all normal-looking people with mastermind PR behind them, especially Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone. Many guys like them because they are attractive in an attainable way, not intimidatingly gorgeous. Fame can really elevate someone's looks that otherwise wouldn't have.

The only case where majority of people find someone attractive is if they have a symmetrical face and follow the golden ratio rule, which is rare. But it really comes down to personal preferences.

The whole symmetry = beauty is BS spouted the media. Symmetry has very little effect on beauty as long as a face isn't noticeably asymmetrical. Nobody's face is perfectly symmetrical and even if it was, the difference in beauty is negligible.

You've got some issues.

[Username]

^^ issues with what?