emilynoel83

Locked
carolinedb
Learner
Learner
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:46 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by carolinedb » Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:53 pm

What was with her in the latest video? Very weird and hyper...

MrsBubbles
Lurker
Lurker
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:27 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by MrsBubbles » Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:58 pm

oh,please wrote:
catcherintherye wrote: Unless QVC offered her a job, quitting her news job was a bad idea.

I'm starting to wonder if she did quit, or whether it was, shall we say, a mutual decision at a moment when her contract was up for renewal. For a journalist to go on YouTube and endorse products in any way, for any reason, is something of a conflict of interest. It would seem even more tangled when she's an anchorperson, so the vision of her on your computer screen when she's doing the makeup thing is easily confused with the vision of her on your TV screen when she's doing a news thing. It doesn't work, and I'm surprised they actually let her get away with it in the first place.
It depends. I'm a reporter with a medium sized newspaper, and to quote an old editor's rule: "I don't care if you have sex with elephants so long as you don't write about the circus."

The idea being that reporters can have opinions on or romantic relationships with subjects not related to their beats (areas of coverage.) In fact, many of my paper's reporters blog about other things for the paper's website. This might be different for television reporters who use their face as their brand far more than print journalists.

I've only ever been recognized in public once while waiting in line at a muffin shop. A guy pulled up my twitter profile picture and asked if it was me. It was surprising and slightly awkward. I'd imagine tv reporters are far more recognizable and therefore more image conscious.

User avatar
maluca
Informer
Informer
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:58 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: emilynoel83

Post by maluca » Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:18 am

This latest 5 minute challenge video jarred me.

On the one hand, she looks SO MUCH BETTER without so much crap on.

On the other hand, her application was a mess! So so sloppy!

heyashbutt
Stalker
Stalker
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:55 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by heyashbutt » Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:02 am

Her application was probably so sloppy because this was the first time she's done her makeup in less than five minutes since that video she did a few years ago.

I still don't understand why she feels the need to pack on foundation every day. She has really nice skin. She doesn't need to cover it up. Heck, my skin is far from good and I don't cake on the foundation every day.

She mentioned that she likes to dedicate half an hour to doing her makeup. I'm curious...Is that a normal amount of time? I probably spend 10-20 minutes if I'm doing an entire face. But, I'd rather sleep in those extra 20 minutes so I've perfected the 5 minute face :lol:

simmerdown
Learner
Learner
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by simmerdown » Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:28 am

I thought the 5 minute video was ok up to the lipstick. I totally disagree with her. If you are going to put on an intense color than you need to be more careful. It doesn't make you look pulled together if the lipstick is sloppy. It is important to line so the color doesn't go all over the place. That finished look was just bad. She would have been better with a lip butter or simple gloss.

User avatar
CataMaria
Talker
Talker
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:14 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by CataMaria » Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:05 pm

She looks so much younger and fresher without all of the eye makeup, lashes, etc. - I don't know why she doesn't take advantage of it!

User avatar
Username
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 952
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: emilynoel83

Post by Username » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:17 pm

I don't know why so many people here comment here saying she looks better without makeup. I think she looks like a trainwreck without makeup.

User avatar
CataMaria
Talker
Talker
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:14 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by CataMaria » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:29 pm

Username wrote:I don't know why so many people here comment here saying she looks better without makeup. I think she looks like a trainwreck without makeup.
hmm, I don't see anything recently about her looking better without makeup entirely (obviously most if not all of us look better with some on than none at all!) but rather she looks nicer without the layers of product on her face and eyes- to me it's aging and not so great looking when all the gurus and women in general wear an abundance of layered makeup ;)

User avatar
KittyKax
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:39 am
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Re: emilynoel83

Post by KittyKax » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:47 pm

I wouldn't say she's a train wreck without makeup, just a little more Plain Jane. I think it's mainly because we're always seeing her so glammed up, so when we see her without makeup it's kind of odd. Like when you meet someone with brown hair and they dye it blonde, it's going to look weird at first because you're not used to that look on them.

Seeing her bare face, all she needs is some eyeliner/mascara, concealer, and maybe a subtle lip color and she would look fine.

User avatar
KillerBee
Debater
Debater
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:26 pm
Location: C-City
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by KillerBee » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:33 pm

I wonder why she does a 5-minute challenge if it's actually not up her alley?
I don't see any point in three get-ready-with-me videos when actually none of them is genuine but only produced for viewers.
And yes, I also think she looks very plain without make up, even though we're probably just used to her "everyday glam" which is still Peggy-Bundy-style to me. Her brows were a mess. I'm not sure if a tinted moisturizer might be enough, she does have to wear something on her skin.

However, I wanted to point out to you that she now officially states in her infobox that she's a sigma affiliate.
Is that a good sign?

User avatar
Username
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 952
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: emilynoel83

Post by Username » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:34 pm

KittyKax wrote:I wouldn't say she's a train wreck without makeup, just a little more Plain Jane. I think it's mainly because we're always seeing her so glammed up, so when we see her without makeup it's kind of odd. Like when you meet someone with brown hair and they dye it blonde, it's going to look weird at first because you're not used to that look on them.

Seeing her bare face, all she needs is some eyeliner/mascara, concealer, and maybe a subtle lip color and she would look fine.
I would still think she's plain, even if she never wore makeup.

jamilu
Learner
Learner
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:18 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by jamilu » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:05 pm

heyashbutt wrote:Her application was probably so sloppy because this was the first time she's done her makeup in less than five minutes since that video she did a few years ago.

I still don't understand why she feels the need to pack on foundation every day. She has really nice skin. She doesn't need to cover it up. Heck, my skin is far from good and I don't cake on the foundation every day.

She mentioned that she likes to dedicate half an hour to doing her makeup. I'm curious...Is that a normal amount of time? I probably spend 10-20 minutes if I'm doing an entire face. But, I'd rather sleep in those extra 20 minutes so I've perfected the 5 minute face :lol:
Eh, I take around half an hour too, but I'm sluggish in the morning and like to really take my time. I think it's just a personal preference.

User avatar
KittyKax
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:39 am
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Re: emilynoel83

Post by KittyKax » Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:44 pm

Am I the only one who doesn't think a large mirror in a pallet is as big of a deal as Emily says it is?
I mean unless you're going camping(which I don't get why you would need to have a full face of makeup in the middle of the wilderness) then wherever you go should have a mirror. If you're in a hotel there's going to be a good mirror, in the car, and even the airplane bathroom has a mirror. I guess if you wanted to do your makeup at your seat on the airplane or on a bus/train(that would be bumpy...)I get it but that's pretty much it.

TheSnarkPalette
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:11 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by TheSnarkPalette » Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:28 pm

I honestly can't believe she's only two years older than me. She looks like she's in her late thirties in her most recent video.

lolwot
Learner
Learner
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:35 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by lolwot » Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:48 pm

KittyKax wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't think a large mirror in a pallet is as big of a deal as Emily says it is?
I mean unless you're going camping(which I don't get why you would need to have a full face of makeup in the middle of the wilderness) then wherever you go should have a mirror. If you're in a hotel there's going to be a good mirror, in the car, and even the airplane bathroom has a mirror. I guess if you wanted to do your makeup at your seat on the airplane or on a bus/train(that would be bumpy...)I get it but that's pretty much it.
I agree. 9 times out of 10 when I'm doing my make-up I'm not looking in the pallet mirror. It's really not that big of a deal, if I happen to be somewhere without a mirror I'm usually carrying some other form of make-up that does come with a mirror, like a blush or a powder compact. That, or I always have one of those Sephora mirrors you get with a gift card kicking around somewhere in my purse. Not a make or break for me.

simmerdown
Learner
Learner
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by simmerdown » Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:12 pm

I knew she'd get a Mally palette in there somewhere. Are Mally products really that popular? The only place I've seen them are QVC so I'm not really sure why she yammers on about Mally all the time. Give it a rest Emily!

User avatar
derseprincess
Learner
Learner
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:01 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by derseprincess » Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:40 pm

I've heard ItsJudyTime ramble about Mally.

haitai
Learner
Learner
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:57 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by haitai » Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:11 pm

this girl or lady or woman really needs to STOP with the mally palette, i get it you are sponsored by them, but give it a rest.

you know emily use to be one of the few gurus i respected bc she had a REAL job as a news anchor and now she's QUIT/got fired who knows! and is purely using YT as a source of income just like allllllll the rest of the gurus and uses so many sponsored products.

everything is just one big commercial and it's annoying.....i wish she would have her old job back bc people who tend to have another job ...doesn't depend on YT for money and HENCE are more likely to post real honest reviews

User avatar
fihe
Extreme Gossiper
Extreme Gossiper
Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:06 pm
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 235 times

Re: emilynoel83

Post by fihe » Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:04 pm

haitai wrote:this girl or lady or woman really needs to STOP with the mally palette, i get it you are sponsored by them, but give it a rest.

you know emily use to be one of the few gurus i respected bc she had a REAL job as a news anchor and now she's QUIT/got fired who knows! and is purely using YT as a source of income just like allllllll the rest of the gurus and uses so many sponsored products.

everything is just one big commercial and it's annoying.....i wish she would have her old job back bc people who tend to have another job ...doesn't depend on YT for money and HENCE are more likely to post real honest reviews
yes, I agree :(

User avatar
mustardmoon1
Extreme Gossiper
Extreme Gossiper
Posts: 1846
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 4:58 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: emilynoel83

Post by mustardmoon1 » Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:44 pm

Does anyone else think that the quality of Emily's videos have gone down since she left her news job? It seems like she is posting fewer videos and the ones she does post are very unimaginative. How many "get ready with me" vids is she going to do? I was hoping she would start reviewing more products, do more "one brand" tutorials and stuff like that. It seems all she does now is run around the country meeting up with friends. I get that her free time was very limited when she was working. But really, if YT is going to be her income, maybe she should put more effort into it?
Never refuse an invitation, never resist the unfamiliar, never fail to be polite, and never outstay your welcome. Just keep your mind open and suck in the experience. And if it hurts you, know what? It was probably worth it........Leonardo DiCaprio

User avatar
Mew
Debater
Debater
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:47 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by Mew » Sun Mar 24, 2013 5:01 pm

I thought she looked really nice in her new Coral video. And younger, too!

simmerdown
Learner
Learner
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by simmerdown » Sun Mar 24, 2013 5:03 pm

I think the way she wears her hair really changes how old or young she looks. When it's curled and all beauty-queened out I think it ages her. In the Coral video it was straighter and in a side ponytail. A much younger look, IMO. She did a video, or two, a few weeks ago with her hair straight and hanging down and I was really surprised at how different she looked.

ashleykillerface
Stalker
Stalker
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:39 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by ashleykillerface » Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:57 am

for someone who worked in television, her lighting situation at night is horrible. you'd think she'd shell out the cash for a few lights or something.

Abra27
Debater
Debater
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83

Post by Abra27 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:14 pm

I'm cringing/dying of laughter at that 'Beauty Broadcast Trailer' video. She's doing that fake ass thing she did in her vlog introduction where she acts like she's being interviewed but you know she's just talking to herself.
Image

Locked

Return to “Emilynoel83”