emilynoel83 part 5

Locked
User avatar
Indilwen
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6910
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:24 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by Indilwen »

Yeah, I was going to say her constantly talking about Cupcake annoys me more than a mention of her brand new baby.

User avatar
Fat Shark
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 4136
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by Fat Shark »

Yep. And Tyler. And I was going to add that if you complain about the baby stuff on a video you are more likely to get a passive aggressive Twitter response along the lines of "Some people don't like me talking about my baby. Sorry for procreating." :lol:
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.

User avatar
shermansown

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by shermansown »

Ha! That's true. I forget how passive aggressive she is. I hate how she calls Cupcake "Baker." That's not a nickname...it's a totally different name! Just pick one. Kind of like Belle and Violet. They don't really go together, just pick one! Oh god, I just realized how intolerable this year's Emily awards are probably going to be. Last year was bad enough with all of the Tyler parts and random shots of Cupcake being terrified. I can't even imagine what madness including the baby will be unleashed this year. Or should I say, next February.

Sorry, I didn't watch the Express channel video so didn't know she was flashing up photos of the baby in beauty videos. That's kind of dumb. I don't mind the "filmed pre-Belle" placards, because people might start commenting about how good she looks post-baby or how fat she looks-post baby or what have you and she would want them to know she was still pregnant in the video.

MrsGrimes
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:54 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by MrsGrimes »

Indilwen wrote:Yeah, I was going to say her constantly talking about Cupcake annoys me more than a mention of her brand new baby.
Her constant mention of cupcake is what worries me about her mentioning the baby. lol

User avatar
Indilwen
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6910
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:24 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by Indilwen »

MrsGrimes wrote:
Indilwen wrote:Yeah, I was going to say her constantly talking about Cupcake annoys me more than a mention of her brand new baby.
Her constant mention of cupcake is what worries me about her mentioning the baby. lol

Ahhh...I see where you're going with this now. Sometimes I'm a little slow on the uptake. :P

User avatar
Fat Shark
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 4136
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by Fat Shark »

I beg to differ about the Baker nickname, Caker is much much worse.

An image of Emily forcing Belle to hold (if she can by that point) "Emily Award Winners" while Tyler annouces and Cupcake flees the room while Emily beams proudly, has suddenly flashed through my brain.
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.

User avatar
shermansown

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by shermansown »

Oh lord. I either have never heard her say "Caker" or in order to protect me, my brain changed it to "Baker."

User avatar
Fat Shark
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 4136
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by Fat Shark »

No she says Baker too. She has a bunch of stupid nicknames for the cat. Baker, Caker, Cake.... I know there are more and they are equally stupid. Sometimes she sticks an s on the end. Just cuz.
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.

User avatar
shermansown

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by shermansown »

Maybe it's a z and not an s.... Cakez...yo.
Image

makeupnewbie
Informer
Informer
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:23 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by makeupnewbie »

bits wrote:...why? The placenta wasn't in there, was it?
No...but I'm surprised there wasn't a hand given WalMart's terrible labor practices.

makeupnewbie
Informer
Informer
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:23 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by makeupnewbie »

bits wrote:...why? The placenta wasn't in there, was it?
No...but I'm surprised there wasn't a hand given WalMart's terrible labor practices.

User avatar
stripedsweater
Naughty
Naughty
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:56 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: emilynoel83 part 5

Post by stripedsweater »


Locked

Return to “Emilynoel83”