emilynoel83 part 5
- Indilwen
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 6910
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:24 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
Yeah, I was going to say her constantly talking about Cupcake annoys me more than a mention of her brand new baby.
- Fat Shark
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:49 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
Yep. And Tyler. And I was going to add that if you complain about the baby stuff on a video you are more likely to get a passive aggressive Twitter response along the lines of "Some people don't like me talking about my baby. Sorry for procreating."
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
Ha! That's true. I forget how passive aggressive she is. I hate how she calls Cupcake "Baker." That's not a nickname...it's a totally different name! Just pick one. Kind of like Belle and Violet. They don't really go together, just pick one! Oh god, I just realized how intolerable this year's Emily awards are probably going to be. Last year was bad enough with all of the Tyler parts and random shots of Cupcake being terrified. I can't even imagine what madness including the baby will be unleashed this year. Or should I say, next February.
Sorry, I didn't watch the Express channel video so didn't know she was flashing up photos of the baby in beauty videos. That's kind of dumb. I don't mind the "filmed pre-Belle" placards, because people might start commenting about how good she looks post-baby or how fat she looks-post baby or what have you and she would want them to know she was still pregnant in the video.
Sorry, I didn't watch the Express channel video so didn't know she was flashing up photos of the baby in beauty videos. That's kind of dumb. I don't mind the "filmed pre-Belle" placards, because people might start commenting about how good she looks post-baby or how fat she looks-post baby or what have you and she would want them to know she was still pregnant in the video.
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
Her constant mention of cupcake is what worries me about her mentioning the baby. lolIndilwen wrote:Yeah, I was going to say her constantly talking about Cupcake annoys me more than a mention of her brand new baby.
- Indilwen
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 6910
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:24 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
MrsGrimes wrote:Her constant mention of cupcake is what worries me about her mentioning the baby. lolIndilwen wrote:Yeah, I was going to say her constantly talking about Cupcake annoys me more than a mention of her brand new baby.
Ahhh...I see where you're going with this now. Sometimes I'm a little slow on the uptake.
- Fat Shark
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:49 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
I beg to differ about the Baker nickname, Caker is much much worse.
An image of Emily forcing Belle to hold (if she can by that point) "Emily Award Winners" while Tyler annouces and Cupcake flees the room while Emily beams proudly, has suddenly flashed through my brain.
An image of Emily forcing Belle to hold (if she can by that point) "Emily Award Winners" while Tyler annouces and Cupcake flees the room while Emily beams proudly, has suddenly flashed through my brain.
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
Oh lord. I either have never heard her say "Caker" or in order to protect me, my brain changed it to "Baker."
- Fat Shark
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:49 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
No she says Baker too. She has a bunch of stupid nicknames for the cat. Baker, Caker, Cake.... I know there are more and they are equally stupid. Sometimes she sticks an s on the end. Just cuz.
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
-
- Informer
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
No...but I'm surprised there wasn't a hand given WalMart's terrible labor practices.bits wrote:...why? The placenta wasn't in there, was it?
-
- Informer
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: emilynoel83 part 5
No...but I'm surprised there wasn't a hand given WalMart's terrible labor practices.bits wrote:...why? The placenta wasn't in there, was it?
- stripedsweater
- Naughty
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0